Australian Politics

1615 readers

60 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

daniel@aussie.zone

billytheid@aussie.zone

In the negative gearing debate, wouldn't the real scandal be if changing it WASN'T examined? (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by bpalmerau@aussie.zone to c/australianpolitics@aussie.zone

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Go Annabel. The history of taxation is not only interesting but vital knowledge.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can we get some more informative titles? 🙃

[–] bpalmerau@aussie.zone 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for gently correcting the noob. Now I know how to do better.

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago

❤️

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago

In the negative gearing debate, wouldn't the real scandal be if changing it WASN'T examined?

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago

Thanks for the post, in general when posting news articles please use the source title and put your personal commentary in the post body or a separate comment. I apologise for not putting this in the community sidebar yet but this is something we tend to do across the instance. It would be good if you could please change the title to the correct one:

In the negative gearing debate, wouldn't the real scandal be if changing it WASN'T examined?

[–] bpalmerau@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for gently correcting the noob. Now I know how to do better.

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you