this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
190 points (97.5% liked)

Fediverse vs Disinformation

1530 readers
4 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

They already make us (is it makes only?) sign up for the draft

One of the first things that pushed me hard to the left.

Also having empathy.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The draft is not conceptually bad. In the case of a national emergency, like Ukraine has had, having the organization for a draft ready if needed is a positive.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ukraine is a land invasion by an aggressive Russia, the US is one of the most geographically isolated countries in the world. We already subjugated our two neighbors so a land invasion is out of the question. Attack by sea? Good luck, we're surrounded by a moat made up of two oceans guarded by a fleet of ships more advanced and numerous than any other country's. The draft is there for us to project our imperial power to the world. The only viable use of the draft then is for a civil war but that would be risky if they bring saboteurs into the army's ranks.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Don't forget our obligation to NATO. It's possible the U.S. could be drawn into a large scale conflict requiring troops.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My argument was in the abstract. Although one should never discount the possibility of the world changing, I'm inclined to agree that the US is unlikely to have a legitimate use for activating the draft with the world as it is now. But the draft, as a concept, is a tool that democratic governments are not wrong to hold onto in case of emergency.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not sure I understand how forced service through a draft. Is any different than voluntary service when your country is being invaded?

The draft implies you don't get a choice in the matter. I really don't understand anyone who thinks the psychology behind people who Don't want to be soldiers being pushed into being soldiers is going to be a healthy army

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

There are numerous reasons why one wouldn't volunteer, but still willingly serve in a draft. Many people feel obligation towards their family, and volunteering would be abrogating that responsibility. The draft removes that issue of internal guilt. Furthermore, drafts can preserve needed skills at home - in WW2, volunteers were often turned away and told to wait for their draft card to turn up, because at that moment their profession was needed for the war industry.

I would highly recommend reading the accounts of soldiers who have been drafted in wars that weren't wildly unpopular with the domestic population and/or 20 year occupations.

In WW2, the vast majority of our military forces were drafted, both US and UK.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm in favor of mandatory military service with almost no exceptions. My rationale is it would make conflict wildly unpopular if everyone had friends and family who would be directly affected.

I encourage everyone to join, but I don't think it should be mandatory because it is most definitely not for everyone. I also support the draft and I believe that women should also be compelled to register.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah it worked so well during the draft, it sure changed a lot of people's minds... Wait did it?

Like, i w as being sarcastic but... Don't think it really changed most people's minds. It's like abortion - everyone against abortion has their hypocritical - The only reasonable abortion is my abortion rule.

I'm sure there's got to be actual studies that were done backed during the American draft and probably in like current day S Korea and such places that have mandatory military service

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I'd argue that the Vietnam draft did have a huge impact on the public reaction to the war. I think one of the reasons it didn't have immediate political results is because affluent people (the kids of politicians) had many ways to avoid service, ie college or well known health excuses. I think if those loopholes were not in place the wide public backlash we saw would have been followed quickly by real political results.

Obviously this is speculation, but there's logic in there.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Why wouldn’t I just deliberately fail the test?

[–] teegus@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago

Straight to jail!

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Good luck with that, damn thing is hard to fail.

It's not pass/fail. They test you on a bunch of different things and give you a percentile score per section and a percentile score overall. They use that to determine eligibility and which jobs you'd qualify and be best suited for. When I joined 20 years ago, you're not getting in with less than a 35, but it's probably a higher minimum score now.

[–] General_Shenanigans@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You WILL be put to work, citizen. Go ahead, get lower scores. Enjoy being cannon-fodder instead of controlling a drone from the safety of base camp. Draft dodger? Well…we have a special place for people like YOU.

(Big /s, just following the idea through some of its logical steps)

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's been factored into the analytics. They are looking for "compliant" personalities.

Military recruitment tests are about finding the best soldiers NOT the brightest or most competent individuals.

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Private schools are fighting to get federal funding. Welcome to the military chumps

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Nope, there would be provisions to exclude private schools. Despite Betsy fucking Devos literally funneling public school funds to private schools

[–] polarpear11@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They made us take the ASFAB (sp?) I Christmas treed it and left. No consequences, no harassment from the military.

[–] sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

A bunch of my classmates all got 99 on the ASVAB when we took it in high school. The recruiters didn't bother talking to us for more than 5 minutes because they knew that we were not desperate enough to go into the military.

The people they tended to target were in the 45-85 range.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I was thinking about going into the army. I took the test and got a 97. My options were nurse or truck driver. I declined to enlist.

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What does it mean to Christmas tree something?

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fill in random dots on a scantron test?

I've never heard the phrase, just a guess based on context.

[–] sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

This is correct

[–] whereBeWaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What stops the children from just choosing random answers and leaving the room? Not I am not american so I really don't know.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I mean it is in a school

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

and who are us?