this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
75 points (98.7% liked)

Moving to piefed.lemmy.fan/c/weird_news - Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

1617 readers
2 users here now

Weird News is moving to https://piefed.lemmy.fan/c/weird_news on Friday June 27th. Please subscribe to the new community before then.

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

More forward thinking companies would realize that if they offered reduced price upgrades or even free upgrades to regulars not only will you have grateful customers but you might just hear the magic words "I could get used to this"

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Free upgrade to regulars? The industry just spent the last decade aggressively devaluing loyalty programs for their regulars, they'd rather sell it to some rich stranger than appreciate a regular's business.

I used to churn cards for miles and accepted the travel I got out of them, but now I'm cash or cash-out only. Miles are worth about half of what they were, or less even 3 years ago.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

For any free-market capitalists out there, this is called "market manipulation." It's the same as spoiling a product and letting it go to waste rather than selling it at the market price, or giving it away, because you'd rather keep the price artificially high. It's part of the grift. They make more by price gouging in times where passengers are desperate than they lose by flying with empty seats. If they were to lower the price to the point where people would actually want to buy them, then the gouging would be too obvious.

[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago

Imagine being so loyal to your business daddy that you don't let someone improve their usually miserable flight experience.

[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

In the past, United has argued that passengers moving up to open seats with extra legroom is immoral

But overbooking and forcing some people to stay where they are isn't?

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I could do see Air Canada doing this, immediately after they hear about it.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

... And now westjet, the little brother trying to catch up, will be right behind them.

[–] variants@possumpat.io 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

On a recent flight I saw the emergency exit was empty so I asked if I could move there and the flight attendant said sure but it would cost like 100 bucks and I was shocked, I remember they would ask if people could sit there and then walk you through the precautions

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Pretty sure it's a requirement to have those filled no?