this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
541 points (98.0% liked)

News

32284 readers
4387 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than half of registered voters say the threat of political violence will be greater if Donald Trump is elected this November, according to a new poll.

While 58 percent of registered voters think the threat of political violence will be greater under Trump if he is elected, 21 percent say it will fall, a poll from CBS News released Sunday reveals. Another 21 percent say there will be no change.

Just over 40 percent of registered voters say the threat of political violence will be greater if current Vice President Kamala Harris is elected, while 27 percent say it will decrease and 30 percent expect it to stay the same, according to the poll.

Roughly 83 percent of Harris voters believe the threat of political violence will be greater under the former president, while 63 percent of Trump voters say it will rise under the vice president if she wins.

The poll comes as GOP leaders blame Democratic rhetoric for the two assassination attempts against Trump this summer.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There will be political violence no matter what the election outcome. If he wins it will be post inauguration. If he loses it will be to try and take power.

There has already been too much political violence this election cycle with two assassination attempts.

Until Trump and his MAGA party are put in their place, either by rule of law or the impact of that violence, we will have violence.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trump is just the fucking symptom. He's terrible but nothing compared to the foaming at the mouse acolytes he has.

We need to make it impossible for this to ever happen again. I just don't see this happening without another civil war.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Trump is also the Lightning rod: Lightning strikes might be less frequent or less focused if he weren’t there

Personally I believe it will be a typical curve:

  • greater violence after the election as the crazies don’t accept the results
  • opportunity to make an example of the crazies. Let use up that jail space formerly dedicated to profiting off minor drug users
  • a general calming as their crazy conspiracies don’t pan out,
  • as Trump realizes he’s too old for another go in four years and retires to Mar El Lago: he’ll still instigate, still dish the crazies but people will realize he’s no longer the lightning rod, the craziness will lose focus
  • Truth Social shits down as the remaining crazies are not a viable business plan
  • try as they might, other Republicans are no Trump. Trying to copy his brand of populous outrage won’t work for them

This is solid summary, Trump has a cult of personality which are rarely transferable once he goes the entire thing will implode. Plus given how Trump motivates otherwise apolitical folks who didnt care beforehand theres a solid chance some of them would just go back to not caring.

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I know it's an autocorrect error, but "foaming at the mouse acolytes"actually works here. "The Mouse" aka Disney. Hah!

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

There has already been too much political violence this election cycle with two assassination attempts.

I just saw this article and I think it's wild.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

… but a majority somehow think he will be better for the economy, so many of them will opt for him. Why he’ll be better for the economy I have no idea, but of course the economy must trump all other things.

Eww, my phone autocorrected “trump” to “Trump.” Twice.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s a plan. The best plan. It will be huge, everyone says it. Well, the concept of a plan really. Actually I'm just saying what you want to hear so I can indulge my ego, attract more fawning, and claim the power to act in my every impulse

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ah ha! You told the truth! Fake news!

Better for the economy in that corporate taxation will cease to exist, complete and utter removal of any workers rights, removal of all corporate red tape and anti monopoly laws and regulations, and constant corporate bailouts using taxpayer money (with only lower and middle classes being the groups that actually pay those taxes).

So if course it'll be a boost for the economy

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't trump promise that himself?

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yes but this story is about people who can vote.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Yeah cuz he keeps saying that. They're not hiding it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

58% of registered voters don't live under a rock.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

I mean we saw trump incite political violence last time he was elected. If trump wins this time, he promised mass deportations. If trump loses this time, he tries another coup. I say we go with trump loses, but that's me.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Yep. The difference is one side is rubbing their hands excitedly while saying it.

There's also the big thread of violence if he's not elected

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

There is 100% chance of political violence regardless because we have a cult of far-right radicals worshipping a con man demagogue. Two assassins this year already went after Donald.

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 2 points 11 months ago

If we’re to take the morons that are voting for Trump seriously- there will be a shit ton of violence if Harris is elected, because they will be the ones causing it.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

Oh there’s going to be “political” violence no matter what. The fascists will either scream about “stolen election” or be given permission to exact their misplaced “revenge.”

Springfield OH is the current testing ground of “how far can we push it,” and the fascist campaign is actively and overtly doing the pushing.

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And what happens if he loses? /s

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

If he loses at least he won't be the dictator of the us. And it's much harder to have your political rivals (people who disagree with your decisions) jailed and or killed if you aren't a dictator or in official power.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

An increase in political violence.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

The threat of political violence will increase if he loses, too.

[–] nemonic187@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

They’ve been literally saying this for months.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There will always be political violence. The only purpose of the state is violence. They're literally promoting a genocide right now. The candidates only debate about who will be more merciless.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

There's political violence right now.

It's just overseas.