Do we just fund the government in installments now? This is getting a little ridiculous
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)
News
37030 readers
2620 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Vote out house republicans
Now? This can has been kicked down the road for years now.
There's no reason that congress couldn't approve funding for the next 20 years, pegged to inflation, with an option to increase if necessary.
But they don't because that would mean they couldn't play political football over it.
a... little....ridiculous?
I'm curious what you would define as "utterly ridiculous"?
I ask because mostly because I need a distraction from this bullshit.
Just a figure of speech. The house and senate funding stuff is an absolute shitshow right now.
Rinse, repeat. Way to hold the federal employees and the entire fucking population hostage, republicans!
So DJT failed to get Mike Johnson to toe the line about forcing a shut down if they didn’t get the voter suppression that he wanted. Sounds like the rest of the party is slipping through his fingers.
Temporary spending bills generally fund agencies at current levels
That's not true. If they could agree on that, it would never come to this much of an impasse in the first place.
an additional $231 million was included to bolster the Secret Service after the two assassination attempts against Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump
What a waste. Would be much better to spend a couple millions teaching his would-be assassins better marksmanship. Would probably save the country dozens of billions in purely monetary terms.
and additional money was added to aid with the presidential transition, among other things.
This might be good, though: more public funding might make it less tempting to solicit private funding from foreign governments and billionaires both foreign and domestic who would want bad things in return for helping foot the bill. Regardless of who wins.