Technology

73792 readers

2992 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

649

Generative AI is reportedly tripling carbon dioxide emissions from data centers (www.techradar.com)

submitted 10 months ago by JRepin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20289663

A report from Morgan Stanley suggests the datacenter industry is on track to emit 2.5 billion tons by 2030, which is three times higher than the predictions if generative AI had not come into play.

The extra demand from GenAI will reportedly lead to a rise in emissions from 200 million tons this year to 600 million tons by 2030, thanks largely to the construction of more data centers to keep up with the demand for cloud services.

(page 2) 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

From construction of three data centers or everyday use. Weird wording this whole article.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

If I run some AI model on my GPU and power my computer via solar power and some batteries, am I actually contributing significantly to GHG emissions?

Like what is the embodied energy of an AI model?

As usual, pundits and scientists confuse what is and what could be with the truth. For example plastic recycling isn't possible because "right now economics don't make it profitable". Meaning capitalism is killing us, not plastics. I suspect the same is true for AI.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does that take into account that AI models will become more efficient with time?

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments