this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
22 points (89.3% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Aww shit here we go again. Monroe doctrine 2.0. Fuck. I pray that latin america isn’t fucked too hard this time.

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Very appropriate username. And I wouldn't expect much difference.

[–] tldrbot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

tl;dr:

US troops have entered Peru periodically for decades, but never for periods as long as this. Most of the US military personnel will be taking part in Resolute Sentinel 2023, a military exercise that will be staged across a number of regions of Peru between June and August. China is already Peru's largest trading partner on both the exports and imports side while Peru is the second largest destination for Chinese investment in Latin America, behind only Brazil. A whopping 32% of Peru's exports go to China, compared with just 12% to the US. But according to the report in Hildebrandt en sus trece, citing other documents by Craig Faller, Washington's soft-power arm USAID will also be playing a part in the US' counter-offensive against China and Russia in Peru. The US Ambassador to Peru, Lisa Kenna, is a former adviser to former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and a nine-year veteran at the Central Intelligence Agency.


I am a bot in training. Suggestions?

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

China sends investors, the US responds by sending military. Sometimes I hate my country. Sorry Peru.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A month ago, Colombia’s first left-wing President Gustavo Petro dismayed many of his supporters by committing to strengthen Colombia’s cooperation with NATO in areas such as climate change, human rights, integrity building and cyber defence

Not just military.

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What would it even mean to co-operate with NATO on

climate change, human rights, integrity building and cyber defence[?]

NATO is only concerned with one of these things. Co-operation in this respect can only mean exacerbating climate change, ignoring human rights, and I don't even know what it might mean for one of the most violent military alliances in history to build integrity.

Edit: missing question mark added.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Climate Change is on the mind of every military in the world.

Any force not planning for what conflicts will erupt is insane.

So yes NATO cares very much about climate change:
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_91048.htm

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I stand corrected. I still don't think they plan to do anything about climate change. Not unless they're forced by public pressure. The plan is more to protect the capitalist class from the destruction of climate change.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

They can work on climate change without NATO but with civilian organizations, if you involve NATO - it is military.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The article describes Dina Boluarte as Peru's "unelected president" — but a different description would be that she was vice-president at the time that president Pedro Castillo attempted a failed self-coup to elevate himself from president to dictator, and was then impeached & removed by Congress.

As a US citizen, I have to wonder if there's an analogy there with Mike Pence, who was VP to president Donald Trump but did not cooperate in Trump's attempted self-coup on January 6 2021. Pence's non-cooperation arguably saved the US from a Trump dictatorship.

Peruvians, or other folks who know more about Peruvian politics — is that an entirely terrible analogy?

[–] thoro@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The situation is pretty complex. I don't have my finger on it entirely, but I get the feeling he was going to be forced out whether he self-couped or not. They seemed to be looking to remove him from the get go and were obstructionist

[–] timicin@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

i love how the people he's screwed hard enough to be forced out of politics continue to publicly insist that they're best buddies with him in the hopes of continuing to woo some kind of base; especially pence. lol

load more comments
view more: next ›