this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
273 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74319 readers
3002 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 97 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Funny business, we need to get them to move to Codeberg

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 45 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can't wait for Codeberge to figure out federation on Activity Pub. Then other groups of people can host their own instance while we slowly move away from centralized repo hosts.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

That is brilliant, I really wish they do it ASAP

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Nah, codeberg is just another company, this could happen there just as it did on gh, granted it'll be less likely to happen there. They need to move to git platform controlled by them.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 40 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Codeberg is not a company tho? It's a non-profit driven community organization

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago
[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 74 points 11 months ago

Another reason not to use GitHub.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully this was a genuine error on GitHub's part and not a sign to come.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't look that way from here?

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Doesn’t look that way from here?

Huh, reinstated. I don't think my submission on Lemmy did the trick but good that it's back.

[–] Shimitar@feddit.it 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Mmmm no? Seems it works

GitHub happened to backtrack about a minute after I posted it. Not that my submission had anything to do with that but I didn't doctor the image. I had a fork of that repo and the e-mail notification that my fork was blocked was sent a couple of hours ago but I don't check mails all the time. The backtracking happened to be in short succession of my submission by happenstance.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can you include the text of the email on the post for context? ❤️

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure:

Access to the AdguardFilters repository has been disabled by GitHub staff due to a terms of service violation.

When making content moderation decisions, we consider information from a variety of sources, including: account profile data, information contained in submitted reports/notices or discovered through our own voluntarily initiated investigations, and context around the contents of the repository.

If you wish to regain access to the disabled content or would like to dispute that a violation occurred and can provide additional information to show that a different decision should have been reached, please review our Appeal and Reinstatement Policy and submit a request via our form.

You may review our terms of service here: GitHub's Terms of Service

Please feel free to Contact GitHub Support if you have any questions.

[–] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Gotta love how no company ever tells you which part of the terms of service where violated

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They do this on purpose, to avoid workarounds.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You've been arrested for breaking the law!

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I mean, they don't tell you which part of ToS you violated because you may come up with some way to circumvent it.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Christ, they track forks? I'm wondering if they wouldn't have known if you had manually pushed to a virgin repo.