this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
196 points (100.0% liked)

News

36993 readers
1786 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Postal Service on Thursday said it needs to shave more costs from its operations to get into better financial shape. To do that, the postal agency wants to overhaul its delivery logistics, resulting in some customers likely seeing a slowdown in their mail delivery.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 176 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

The 👏 USPS 👏 is 👏 a 👏 government 👏 service and does not need to be "profitable". You don't hear people complaining that the military "loses" $700B a year.*

I know DeJoy can't just be fired, but I really wish there were some progress toward ousting him.

* Aside from the valid complaints about military spending in general. Also the $700B figure is likely out of date.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

A great deal of the financial pressure that the USPS has been under resulted from the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act [which] required the Postal Service to create a $72 billion fund that would pay for its employees’ retirement health benefits for more than 50 years into the future

The system is absurd and intentionally so. The goal of this system is to starve the USPS of spendable cash in a quixotic effort to save money for employees who haven't been born yet.

I know DeJoy can’t just be fired

Biden has the power to fire and replace the entire USPS Board of Governors. The replacements then have the power to replace DeJoy.

But in much the same way Biden refuses to pack the SCOTUS (a nine seat bench that presides over thirteen appellate courts and should have been expanded decades ago), he's dragging his heels on a Board of Governors long ago stacked with Republican nominees. This is because Biden fucking voted for this policy. One of the worst bills in US History was passed through the Senate with unanimous consent.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Decorum strikes again!

(Am I ever tired of the government being run by people who do what they do because that's the way they've always done it. No more greatests/silents/boomers who have been in government for 20, 30, 40, 50 years please.)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

"Decorum," or just Democrats not actually being the allies to normal people that people want them to be.

(To be clear: that's still way better than the Republicans' outright mustache-twirling villainy.)

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lol, yeah. $700B was just the last figure I recalled clearly but was pretty sure it had increased.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

It always increases, sigh...

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The key difference is the USPS is self-funded, so it does need to cover costs and maintain a reserve to cover downturns, which it could do by expanding into basic banking services, like check cashing, if DeJoy was not tasked with grinding the service down.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Tasked? DeJoy owns a freight company, breaking and outsourcing USPS is in his financial interest

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Ugh does he really?

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He didn’t appoint himself to the job.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

No he was just appointed by a fascist to dismantle the USPS to try and block mail in votes

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

so it does need to cover costs

What about that determination isn't 100% arbitrary?

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Do you think postal carriers work for free? Salaries, vehicle maintenance, keeping the lights on, etc, these are all real expenses.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 13 points 2 years ago

700 billion is just the figure that we get to know about

Maybe if they would take that 700 billion and invest it in an interest-bearing way, They would be able to pay for them selves.

[–] mystik@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

The hold up is that the new appointees Biden picked also support DeJoy, because Biden doesn't actually oppose DeJoy's destruction of USPS.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

As a cancer patient, I have to say: This is fucked.

I'm not an old person yet, but I already have one old person issue: I have a specialized drug that I need to stay alive, that is also only available via mailorder.

Tons of elderly have a fuckton of medications just like that. All of them only available from specialized pharmacies that only are available by mail order.

This will kill people waiting to get life saving medications. That is all.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

And also because of the ridiculousness of controlled substances, you can't just order ahead for, say, 2 months of buffer that could negate the risk of delays.

Because people can't be trusted with too much medicine. Like everyone's going to OD on cancer drugs or something if they don't ration it out to the day.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have this problem. My doctor tried to get me 2 months of my medication and the pharmacist said, "yOuR iNsUrAnCe DoEsN't clCoVeR tHaT." Ain't painkillers or anything, literally my drug to keep me alive. If I wanted to OD theres a lot of easier drugs you could get without a pharmacist.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have 3.5 cats on the same medication (0.5 cat is shared custody we watch sometimes). Juggling 4 prescriptions is a pain in the ass. Life would be much simpler if we could just get a Costco sized bottle of it and be good for half a year or more. For a medication that is very commonly prescribed for elderly cats.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I wholeheartedly agree. We could get prescribed years of medication, because the expiration date on medication isn't even true.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 6 points 2 years ago

Also, insurance doesn't care if you are almost out and it will take three weeks to get there. Sorry, we can't authorize payment for another ten days!

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'd never want to have life-saving meds sent through the USPS.

You can get specialized services for shipping pharmaceuticals to your pharmacy, like what FedEx offers..

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Resorting to a private service because USPS is prevented from doing its job is exactly what the saboteurs want.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Saboteurs, IE Republicans.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The pharmacy in question is CVS Specialty, and they already offer shipping direct to a local pharmacy.

That doesn't really change the calculus that if it is sent via USPS, and USPS has slowdowns, that it may take dangerously too long to arrive.

They don't really let you choose what partner they're going to ship with, so it's a "you get what you get" situation and I can't ask for FedEx specifically if I wanted it. They ship with whatever's cheapest to them at a given time.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

That's a real shame, really.

Perhaps this threat of mail slowdown will prompt CVS to use other providers. I can't imagine they'll want to jeopardize their customer's health and safety by using an unreliable and slow method of shipping critical medication.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's election time. Better slow the mail down to stop THOSE people from defrauding our democracy! /s

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I like the joke, but that was the first thing I looked for in the article. At least they’re not doing that this time

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Why wasn’t DeJoy arrested for last time.

Unfuckingbelievable that shit stain still has that job.

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

USPS does not need to make a profit, this is just bonkers. I live in a rural area and don’t even get mail delivery, and for a time we didn’t even have a local post office. Here’s hoping that doesn’t happen again.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They shouldn't be required to profit, or break even, but they pretty much are.

We're self-funding. The Postal Service generally receives no tax dollars for operating expenses and relies on the sale of postage, products and services to fund its operations.

OTOH, not seeing how that prevents government funding:

The statute that created the Postal Service begins with the following sentence: “The United States Postal Service shall be operated as a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States, authorized by the Constitution, created by an Act of Congress, and supported by the people.” 39 U.S.C. §101(a).

https://facts.usps.com/top-facts/

[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

If DeJoy could just get fired, and Congress could undo the asinine retirement fund the postal service is forced to fund that pays for retirement of people the post office will hire in the future. This wouldn't be happening. They could expand service. That's right! Georgie bush Jr and the republicans forced the USPS to pay retirement so far ahead it covers people not old enough to work there yet. Prior to that the post office had money left over and they had a good retirement plan. Plus FedEx an ups said they ain't gonna fill in for the post office, they are not capable with their infrastructure for the prices charged. Postal service is required and a good service when it's being run properly, and not being forced to look incompetent by two faced politicians claiming to be business savy.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why is DeJoy still in charge of USPS?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Because Biden wants him to be. Biden has made enough appointments to the USPS Board of Governors that they would have a majority to remove DeJoy if they wanted, but Biden appointed DeJoy supporters instead.

Edit: if you downvoters think I'm wrong, reply with an alternative explanation.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I actually agree with you. Though I don’t know why Biden has left him in place. DeJoy sucks, and I hope the next Democratic president pushes to remove him.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

CBS News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CBS News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/usps-mail-slowdown-postmaster-louis-dejoy/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

Bills are almost paperless. They are he only thing we need USPS for is packages, that's it. Some people get their meds and such through USPS.