this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
283 points (91.0% liked)

unions

1648 readers
1 users here now

a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc

Friends:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 191 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"So anyways that's why I've decided it's illegal for you to strike"

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago

Yep. Biden is antiunion and it's disappointing to see this posted here.

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago

Lol exactly. What a fucking joke.

[–] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 105 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Didn't Biden sign a law forcing an entire sector into a labor contract that was rejected by all the unions?

[–] arquebus_x@kbin.social 60 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

After the railroad workers were forced to end their strike, the Biden administration and the union continued working on the problem and on April 20 the workers got the sick day agreement they demanded. It's not like they were just dropped by the administration. While I do grant that breaking the strike was not great, it's not as if that was the end of the story.

[–] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 years ago

Oh cool, he threw them some scraps after breaking the strike. What a fantastic win for labor power.

[–] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] JaymesRS@midwest.social 19 points 2 years ago

That article is older than the recent agreement that got the sick days. So sentiments may not be the same.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/may/01/railroad-workers-union-win-sick-leave

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

They'd of got a lot more if they were able to strike. A strike is the biggest tool unions have to leverage. They might of got a better deal without even having to strike. The lack of the possibility ruined their chances of getting anything better. I wish they'd done some kind of slowdown or walk out anyway.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Fortunately, as several other commenters point out, that wasn’t the end of the story.

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] the_q@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

They should strike. Grind it to a halt. Destroy the corrupt economy and rebuild it from the ground up.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Be a lot cooler if he did something that aligned with this instead of just talking a big game. I lost so much respect for his administration when they killed the rail strike. Legislatively stopping a strike is about the most undemocratic corporate bullshit I can think of the more labor sided/left leaning party in a country doing. Neo liberalism is not on the side of organized labor no matter what they say.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The guy who told factory workers he doesn't work for them still lies to our faces about having our best interests in mind.

[–] JaymesRS@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That wasn’t what happened. Someone was spouting off about how Biden wanted to take everyone’s guns after seeing a manipulated video then threw out the ”I pay your salary, you work for me” line that every jackass like to throw at public employees like police or people just doing their job at the DMV.

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nah, I think it’s perfectly reasonable to say that to politicians. They’re supposed to be public servants and they need to be reminded of that as often as possible.

And yes he absolutely SHOULD be working for factory workers. Don’t be such a cuck to these people. They’re supposed to be serving you, and they aren’t, and they don’t even pretend to be, and you’re allowed to be angry about it.

[–] JaymesRS@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It’s not “reasonable” to say that to anyone, by the time you’ve said it you’ve given up on actively communicating. It serves no purpose to make progress on an issue, it’s really just an adult temper tantrum retort. The second part of your comment makes no sense in the context of the actual situation, you might as well just be regurgitating AI text with that sort of CHAD GPT level comprehension.

[–] NataliePortland@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just like when he ordered striking train workers to return to work after several derailments occurred

[–] arquebus_x@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

This was a pleasant surprise. I remember being highly disappointed in AOC when she voted to end the strike. She insisted that the Biden administration would stay focused on the sick day issue. I thought it was just political bullshit, and she was merely covering herself.

I was very happy when I found out that instead of caving in and becoming just another corrupt politician, AOC had actually been TELLING THE TRUTH!

[–] Uprise42@artemis.camp 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Biden has accomplished more in his time in office than Trump could have dreamed to. But that doesn’t make him a good president. He shut down a rail strike and told those people they don’t matter by forcing them back without rail companies meeting their demands. This is just classic “I support you” campaigning speak. He doesn’t really care

[–] MrPhibb@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

True, but from what I read not too long ago, they did finally get their vacation time, because apparently despite ending the strike, they kept working on the problem. I'm never sure how good or bad he is because he really doesn't toot his own horn, getting rail workers their vacation time was basically a back page article.