this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
63 points (95.7% liked)

Firefox

17857 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 78 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I much preferred the moz://a logo, its such a clever concept for a web company

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Are they just... waving a white flag as if they surrender?

I kinda like the current Moz://a logo.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

It's transparent. Probably shouldn't be

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 29 points 11 months ago

Is this an early or late April Fools?

[–] kbal@fedia.io 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

that the new duckduckgo logo?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Yes, for their lynx fork.

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not claiming your opinion would be wrong. But I honestly don't know why one would hate it (not joking if it sounds like :D) .

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 11 months ago

I much preferred the moz://a logo, its such a clever concept for a web company

i really liked the old :// part in the logo. I even made a post here based on it earlier.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 9 points 11 months ago

Bring back red dinosaur! /s

What font is it? Not the Fira nor Fira Code.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Holy cow, what an ugly font.

[–] mina@berlin.social 3 points 11 months ago

@Dirk

I can only hope, nobody got any money for this.

@pnutzh4x0r