this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
469 points (99.2% liked)

News

37007 readers
1824 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 57 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Fossil fuel companies are running “a massive mis- and disinformation campaign” so that countries will slow down the adoption of renewable energy and the speed with which they “transition away” from a carbon-intensive economy, the UN has said.

Really wish the headline would add in the who.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Free speech is one thing, but if you're lying for personal gain there should be consequences. Clearly we can't keep going on this way, especially when it comes to climate.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago

Literally all of the global fossil fuel companies.

[–] Atsur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What does the World Health Organization have to do with it?

[–] kevindqc@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Pollution kills millions every year

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (5 children)

There is this prevailing narrative – and a lot of it is being pushed by the fossil fuel industry and their enablers – that climate action is too difficult, it’s too expensive

The thing is, adequately addressing the climate crisis is going to be very difficult and expensive. We should do it anyway, because if we don't the consequences are likely to be severe, but I don't think we should lie to people and say it's going to be cheap and easy. This is going to be hard. Really hard. This is our moonshot, only many times more difficult. But that's exactly why we should do it.

Somewhere along the line, we turned into a country that is afraid of doing anything too difficult. We used to do things because they were difficult, now we shy away from anything that's even remotely challenging. Do people remember JFK's 'We Choose To Go To The Moon' speech?

We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win

What happened to us? I think I answered my own question: we need leaders who can inspire people to take on incredible challenges. We need someone who will stand up in front of the American people and say, "yes, addressing climate change is going to be hard, and that's exactly why we are going to do it! We can do it, we must do it, we will do it."

[–] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Late stage capitalism happened to us. Big money saw the writing on the wall as we got smarter and more ambitious and progressive as a people and said “not in my backyard”.

[–] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Goddamn, I love that speech every time I hear or read it.

Edit: unsaladed the thing.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

it was a different time. people did things because they were hard because they themselves were harder. they were also teamed together, opposite of now. people use to get worried if the city over got the new jobs, not the country over.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah it’s going to be very expensive. Not nearly as expensive as not doing it, but more immediately expensive. And the longer we hold off the more expensive and difficult it gets and the less resources we’ll have to do it with. We should have taken it seriously before I was born, but we need to now

Is America not the country that claims to be the greatest on earth? Why would we not do this then? Why should we not lead by example and show the world what can be done? This world has done so much for America, it’s time we ask not what the world can do for America but what America can do for the world. And worst case scenario, we get cheaper energy and a cleaner country.

[–] tekila@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep Big meat and dairy is doing the same in the food industry. Fuck those corpos.

Here's a video about the subject in the US https://youtu.be/hmCvD9KxSB8

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

You said Big Meat, haha

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

You don’t say.

There’s a big orange man right now saying wind is fake, and kills whales.

[–] 432@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In West Texas, renewable energy has been and will continue to grow like crazy. Nothing is going to be able to stop it.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

It also doesn't help that the USA, one of the biggest polluters of the world, recently instituted massive tariffs on green energy technologies in the name of protecting domestic industry that refuses to price such technologies at levels that would let people afford switching to them.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 12 points 2 years ago

I've tried to tell people this for years