this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
155 points (87.4% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 95 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

These people think she's not fuckable so therefore she's not a woman, and furthermore think women's sports are worthless unless they see the athletes as fuckable. That's it. It's patriarchy with a new coat of paint.

The two genders: male and fuckable

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

Have some Lemmy Gold.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You wouldn't fuck a couch, would you?

Oh, you would? Then mind your own business.

[–] TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Hey, don't kink shame.

Couches literally have more cushion for the pushin'

[–] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Wasn't this was the Ancient Greek version of gender?

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ive always had this feeling, increasingly validated lately, that there's some weird push to invalidate all women that the right doesn't find fuckable.

There's all this coming after women for having T, and before the Olympics there's been a rise in this "if you think this woman is attractive (generic female athlete), you're GAY" Content.

[–] boogetyboo@aussie.zone 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's really obvious when they're having a go at cisgender white women about makeup or certain clothes or haircuts or body types. You always see the same comments explaining to women that they ackshually prefer 'natural looks' or less revealing clothing or long hair or 'something to hold on to'.

It's all through a lens of 'why do you make choices about yourself that don't improve your appeal to me, someone who wants to fuck you'.

That there are women that completely reject all those notions or don't seek their opinions (women who are trans, women who aren't hetero, women who reject traditional feminine looks, women who excel in their careers or physical sports) simply doesn't compute with these people's view of what women are.

The more malicious parts of that mindset lead to that push you're talking about. We as women are still just something that needs to validate its existence. Any deviation from that is viewed as something that should never have existed at all.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

They just hate women and more so if they aren't white women.

[–] don@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There should be a campaign to purge the right from, well, everything.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there is, it's just not going very well.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Mock them more.

[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 1 year ago

There were many throughout the years but they always end in authoritarianism, censorship, corruption, surveillance, povery, hunger, death and eventual collapse.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What a shit website. Demands I sign up to read lol, uhh no? Ublock, you failed me.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reader mode easily bypasses that

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is reader mode available on mobile?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It is on mine?

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really?! I have never seen a paywall there, and I usually access it using tor browser (so, coming from a variety of countries).

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm using mobile. It's a full screen for me, no way I can see to circumvent it.