this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
1178 points (84.7% liked)

Technology

73967 readers
3302 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bappity@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I really hope they don't go back on this because it's really going to damage their bottom line and I have popcorn to eat

[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm kind of tired of hearing about what this dummy is up to. He's very rich. But clearly very dumb. He took emerald mine money and lucked his way into some good investments. Bought his way into Tesla and pretends to be very smart.

Thats not to say every idea he has had is bad. But he is clearly not a smart man overall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] asunaspersonalasst@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Shit won't fly because of some App Store/Play Store policies lol

ITT: "Blocking isn't a necessary feature, specifically because I do not get harassed." Also: "Because you COULD just make an alt, take the time to make a fake email, and even potentially be required to have a fake ID in the future, muting and blocking are LITERALLY the same thing"

Any disincentive is one more step some spineless bastard has to go through to harass you, even if there are work arounds.

[–] Bigs@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

I'll bet a buffalo nickel that this is so Musk can guarantee eyeballs on ads.

Arg: expected eyeballs on ads not 100% because blocking. This shiny new 'X' will guarantee 100%.

Tinfoil: If he can disrupt B2B on ads and seize more marketing market share, he looks like a genius and gets to add a payment feature to X. I don't think he's very creative and will just remake PayPal with a fuckton of extra steps.

[–] fred@lemdro.id 4 points 2 years ago

I thought he was relying to his own Tweet

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

What could possibly go wrong.

[–] Decimit@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

So he’s pulling an Elon again.

[–] Pacers31Colts18@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Can we defederate from Twitter/X already?

[–] geek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm going to be excited to see how this plays out with legal controls.

That being said removing block isn't necessarily a terrible idea if you plan to expand what your privacy controls are.

You should be able to restrict who can see your content. If they take away that aspect, that would be hilarious and ridiculous.

We'll see how it all plays out

[–] emberwit@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

Not having your tweets displayed publicly is not blocking. It's just about which public tweets you are shown.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›