this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
115 points (87.6% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

7785 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

it is regulated by many the same groups who utilize the system, and so it is inherently corrupt.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AuroraZzz@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Counterpoint. Your money is going to lose value to inflation and commodities are speculative and don't have a labor force working for you. Invest in CDs if you are wary of using stocks/ETFs/options

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Listening to music can help one forget the fact that they're broke, sure

[–] TheOneCurly@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

"Should not be" in an abstract sense, sure. In cold reality, I don't see what other strategy someone has to actually retire. Safer investments don't have anywhere near the same returns.

My 401k balance disagrees with you.

The system is deeply flawed but I’m still going to retire with several hundred thousand dollars more than I would have if I had just put that money in savings.

Don’t let idealism blind you to reality on decisions that have such far reaching consequences for your life. Put your money in index funds and vote for people who say they will improve the system.

[–] Goodie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Ypu sre right in that the stock market, especially the US stock market, is a cluster fuck.

But it's a cluster fuck that mostly goes up, with solid returns over the last 10-20 years in index funds. I'm not going to cut my nose to spite my face on that, especially when the populous alternatives, like being a landlord, tend to have serious ethical concerns.

For examples of why the market is fucked, something your argument clearly lacked, the biggest indicator for me is that news of large buys/saells tend to move the market much more than the actual buy/sale.

(Personal theory, derivatives pretty much control the market, and a buy/sell doesn't interact with calls/puts typically, but the news of a sale gets people to interact with calls/puts)

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's kinda hard to tell if this is unpopular or not on the surface, because it's not exactly a rare opinion, and it's one that's shared by a shit ton of people. But it's definitely an opinion that draws a shit ton of heat because it goes right to the heart of realism vs idealism. Three should part looks like it's only about the current system because you focussed on the stock market, despite the fix for your should being systemic rather than specific.

The way the system currently works, it's necessary, and should be part of a retirement fund.

But the current system sucks, and we should have robust funding in place to take care of each other as we age out of work. And that goes for other forms of retirement like disability.

I think that your post deserves an upvote as unpopular because what you're talking about is fundamentally shifting the economic model towards a more socialist way of handling the safety net. That is distinctly unpopular in a lot of the world, and particularly unpopular in capitalist nations.

Now, ignoring the C/ that we're in and the question of popularity, there is the middle ground solution of improving oversight and regulation of the market which would take the reins of power into the hands of the government. The flaw in that is in it being in the hands of governments, but that's a flaw in any social safety net that exists stay anyway.

I err on the side of formal programs with tight regulations on reducing them that are funded by the populous and heavy taxation on wealth and capitalist actions, if we're going to stay capitalist rather than entirely upending the system as it is. But I'd prefer the system itself to change.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 1 year ago

funny thing is that before all the retirement went into it it sorta made sense but now the whole thing is a pyramid scheme kept afloat by the retirment plans. Its been wierd since the start of this millenium

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

See you're absolutely right, but simultaneously, there's no other system that allows your savings to potentially beat inflation, and at the same time, it's impossible to completely stop inflation and deflating currency can actually have VERY BAD consequences for small markets not able to operate during spending strikes. Even a federally managed pensioner's fund based on a Norway style sovereign wealth fund will inherently rely on this inherently corrupt system to preserve people's hard work and savings against inflation long term, they're just gonna be kinda smarter about it and able to be fired if they fuck it up or act too obviously corrupt.

[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 6 points 1 year ago

This is just terrible financial advise. You will not get returns better than from stock market funds. You can absolutely expect to have a significant portion of your pension pot coming from investment returns that you would not have if you put your money elsewhere. So sure, if you want to retire poorer than necessary, don't invest your money in the stock market.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Downvote because this isn't unpopular, it's plain wrong and financially bad advice - that if anyone takes will kill their retirement.

Short term it can be up and down (nonsense if you want), but long term over decades it's the best way to invest your retirement money. And we need to since the demise of Defined Benefit pensions. With Defined Contribution "pensions" we need to save our money in vehicles that grow it.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It amazes me that companies aren’t forced to pay a certain percentage of profit as dividends.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

im amazed at a market with zero sales 'trade' tax.

every trade should have a % of value tax, or $50.00, whichever is greater

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The tax is on pulling it out. People make small trades all the time, and computers make millions of them. It would take more time and money to calculate the taxes than the actual taxes.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would take more time and money to calculate the taxes than the actual taxes.

this is a feature, not a detriment.

[–] sour@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago

Wait, so if a single thing that costs 10bucks and gets traded between companies 100 times should be taxed 100 times before it reaches the end consumer?

Do you really need to be told how much this increases prices?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

There’s a tax on gains realized or something, right? But you’re right, I think, that taxing each transaction would do a lot to help redirect wealth from the ultra rich. I’ll consider it further, but I think you’ve persuaded me.

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sigh. It hurts that I agree with you; only because you’re right.

However it does try to achieve equality in its corruption. ???

Do not muck about with individual stocks. Stick to index funds

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Ambiguous should:

We "should" be able to rely on an immutable and reliable system to provide for us when we are old. Like a government that gives a fuck or something.

Without that, you "should" still make safe and sane financial investments, even if the system is rigged and corrupt, because no suitable alternative exists.

[–] HauntedBucket@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Unpopular? That's my opinion!

[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unpopular opinion or financial illiteracy?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Do you have any alternatives?

So far the stock market has treated people well. It outpaces inflation, and is safer than other investments

There you have it, folks, the devil wants you to be poor in your old age

[–] bear@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

Disagree on a practical level. To me it's like saying war is evil, so never defend yourself. You can participate in a relatively safe and ethical way like an economic form of self defense.

ITT: I'm personally benefiting from the corrupt system and I can't imagine that will ever change so the stock market is a good thing.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ah the old 'post a popular opinion in /c/unpopularopinion' gag

never change ~~reddit~~ lemmy

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i actually thought this unpopular as i get shit on repeatedly in threads stating it ... that and, ya know, every corporation and the US govt decided it should be this way

no need to be a dick about it.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it wasn't my intention to be a dick. i apologize

please keep posting, and if someone's being a dick, tell them to go eat shit!

thank you for your consideration, i really appreciate it.