this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
670 points (98.4% liked)

Comic Strips

23167 readers
3269 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
670
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by sag@lemm.ee to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 

Source: Website - RSS

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jherazob@fedia.io 71 points 2 years ago

They say: "Disable adblocking to visit our site"

I hear: "DO NO visit our site"

[–] Metz@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I have nothing against ads in principle. Anyone who offers a service such as a useful website should of course be rewarded for it.

What I am against is intrusiveness and tracking. If advertising were just simple locally served banners in the sidebars of the website without any tracking, as it used to be, I would have no problem with it.

[–] anarchist@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly. To let advertisers intrude on your brain for what you get in exchange is usually an unfair bargain. People really undervalue their attention and time.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I have crippling ADHD and I am constantly amazed at how little people value their attention. Just baffled watching folks melt their brains on things like TikTok.

It's like watching a teenager buying drugs. Just... you don't know what consequences this could bring you.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Not to mention ads have been caught being straight up malware and phishing without any real vetting on behalf of the ad companies. Malware has even gotten to the top of Google search results just by buying an ad slot they didn't vet. It's become a legitimate and serious security concern.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

If advertising were just simple locally served banners

And didn't let anybody run scripts on your page, and had any kind of filtering so people won't get malware by clicking on the ads.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the same way that a year ago I watched YouTube with ads. I’m not watching with ads if it’s even close to the same amount of ad as video

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I literally subbed to a podcast using the RSS, and they feed ads through like most podcasts do these days. It started with two ads, ok fine that's not too bad. It plays the podcast for 8:50ish, and then drops, not "another," but four ads. It very well may have been more than four too, but during the fourth (sixth total) I stopped the podcast and unsubbed. Not only were there all those ads, but part of the actual eight whole minutes the hosts talked was them plugging their patreon.

None of this was hyperbole, and I remember it well as it happened yesterday.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

There's a few youtubers I've either stopped watching, or very rarely watch, because of the amount of plugging they do. I get that they have bills to pay, but some of them are ridiculous.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'd rather have the internet die than to watch ads. I don't want to see it burn, but I am prepared to pay that price.

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't worry, the internet won't die. It was just fine before ads.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago

There were definitely ads floating around on ARPANET in the late 70s, even though weren't technically allowed. It's kinda been with the internet all along.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

pop over says to disable content blockers

Me: uses content blockers to block pop over

[–] jinwk00@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

And then there are "disable ad-blockers" + "Ad-free subscription" sites

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

The fourth panel is a literal gun emerging from the screen & threatening your loved ones.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 8 points 2 years ago

Well this led me down a rabbit-hole. I thought the character looked familiar, which led me to their origin from an older comic by a different creator. And the discovery that the original creator is anti-trans, yuck.

Glad to see Mimi and Eunice in better company these days. Thanks for posting this comic!

[–] maniel@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Somehow this doesn't fully represent how actual AD popups are obnoxious nowadays

If you've allowed enough trash from a website to run on your browser that they are then able to run checks to determine whether you are blocking ads, then you have been far too lenient with your blocker settings.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I find them far too distracting from the content.

I have a hard time focusing when the TV is on in the background, and a lot of ads are like having multiple TVs in the bgr.

So I turn them off.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's usually other companies wanting you to buy their shit, not the site that the ads are shown on. That site "makes its living" by selling ad-space to these other companies.

I dislike ads just as much as the next person but I feel like this representation is disingenuine.

[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago

This is fair

However, it's up to the site how they choose to display ads, and UI/UX. If the content pane is like 1/4 the size of my screen, we're gonna have problems

[–] Sidhean@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If the screen had shouted "Buy this shit!" Would it have hit different? I had the same thought. I've seen a few sites that advertise their own wares and they are sketchy. I think the issue is that the site is still in charge of how much advertising they show. Usually, they're showing unrelated ads, but they're showing a lot of them.

I dislike ads just as much as the next person, and I'm just curious if I understand you properly.