this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
90 points (87.5% liked)

General Discussion

13409 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules and Policies

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
90
Hey. You. Fill in the blank. (upload.wikimedia.org)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by JohnSaveourSocks@lemmy.world to c/general@lemmy.world
 
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] barttier@feddit.de 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

...of them.

I said the last sentence two times for emphasis.

[–] zecg@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

That doubling rate is worrying

[–] Kyoyeou@slrpnk.net 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From Wikipedia for the people like me that are curious

A Nice link to the Wiki Page

Gleason devised the Wug Test as part of her earliest research (1958), which used nonsense words to gauge children's acquisition of morphological rules‍—‌for example, the "default" rule that most English plurals are formed by adding an /s/, /z/, or /ɪz/ sound depending on the final consonant, e.g. hat–hats, eye–eyes, witch–witches. A child is shown simple pictures of a fanciful creature or activity, with a nonsense name, and prompted to complete a statement about it:

This is a WUG. Now there is another one. There are two of them. There are two ________. Each "target" word was a made-up (but plausible-sounding) pseudoword, so that the child cannot have heard it before. A child who knows that the plural of witch is witches may have heard and memorized that pair, but a child responding that the plural of wug (which the child presumably has never heard) is wugs (/wʌgz/, using the /z/ allomorph since "wug" ends in a voiced consonant) has apparently inferred (perhaps unconsciously) the basic rule for forming plurals.

[–] Moshpirit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[–] JohnSaveourSocks@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I sat here, for like 5 minutes, saying wugs out loud trying to figure out the joke before I clicked through to the comments and saw this lol

[–] BunnyKnuckles@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago

You silly goose! The plural or wug is wagon.

[–] MisterChief@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Thank you, I was confused.

I immediately went to "now there are two wug wugs".

[–] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Why nobody says wugs?

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Es gibt zwei Wüge.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago
[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SpoopyKing@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

Many much MOOSEN

[–] rynzcycle@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wuggles.
Done, what do I win?

[–] JohnSaveourSocks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] MrGerrit@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How much is that in schmeckles?

[–] zaphod@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

It's wug, but you pronounce it like weeg.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago
[–] SamB@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

There are two weg.

[–] Moshpirit@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Wugerfuckers

[–] walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 years ago

Wags, there are two wags

[–] Kinten@feddit.nu 2 points 2 years ago

Clearly it's wugi

[–] JohnSaveourSocks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)
[–] WhatASave@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

A Quirk Dog!

[–] noproblemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Quirk infested

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] Untitled_Pribor@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago
[–] Wander@yiffit.net 1 points 2 years ago
[–] dipshit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

badly drawn birds

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago