this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
69 points (87.1% liked)

Marvel Studios

3975 readers
200 users here now

Lemmy


Welcome to MarvelStudios, a community for discussing all things related to Marvel TV/Film productions with a focus on Marvel Studios.

This community is a place to discuss, share and generally have fun with all things Marvel Studios.


Upcoming TV/Film:


MCU TV/Film Discussion:


Non-MCU Discussion:


Misc Discussion:


Community Guidelines

  1. Be constructive. As a community this is place for discussion, things you liked, things you didn't like, any everything in between. Low effort comments don't add to the discussion.
  2. Be civil. Disagreements happen. Don't attack others. Take a moment and reconsider before you post an inflammatory comment in all caps.
  3. No spam. Please don't post spam, trolling or other low effort content. If you're a human and you saw something interesting or had an interesting thought, you're probably fine.
  4. Memes are allowed. We're a small community, feel free to post memes or similar content. Funny things are good. If it becomes a problem we can discuss changing the rules.

In addition like any community we follow the Lemmy.World content policy rules. In short, don't attack people or groups.


Spoiler Guidelines

When should something no longer be considered a spoiler? In general use your best judgement. If want something more specific,


Related Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Deadpool & Wolverine: $438,300,000

The Marvels: $206,136,825

Madame Web: $100,298,817

(Yes, I know Madame Web isn't an MCU movie.)

Here's looking at you, bub.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 1 year ago

A movie that lots of people wanted to see made more money than two movies that no one cared about. How about that?

[–] Don_Dickle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to be a clit...but that is kind of a low bar to set. Because the two movies might have been good on streaming but have no place getting compared to Ryan Renolds and Hugh Jackman. and I say that as I am not a fan girl.

[–] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I agree, low bar. Let's see how it did against Deadpool, Deadpool 2, and movies with wolverine ~~in them~~ as the lead:

  • Deadpool & Wolverine (2024) – $205M opening [TBD domestic]
  • Deadpool (2016) – $132.4M opening/$363M domestic
  • Deadpool 2 (2018) – $125.5M opening/$324.5M domestic
  • Logan (2017) – $88.4M opening/$226.2M domestic
  • X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009) – $85M opening/$179.8M domestic
  • The Wolverine (2013) – $53.1M opening/$132.5M domestic

Source.

[–] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 3 points 1 year ago

Eventually it'll be added here, in an actual sortable table.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, they spent enough on marketing. I can't take a shit in a toilet without RR and HJ popping out of the trashcan to run a skit. People are making cakes, printing out 18" tall lego figures, tractor trailers and fireworks shows, it's EVERYWHERE!

[–] PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

As someone who avoids trailers and such to go in as blind as possible I've had a tough time escaping it.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

So... why are we comparing it exactly to these two movies? There are a few other Marvel and Marvel-adjacent movies one could compare.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Being uncharitable: Because woke women movie bad and not woke men movie good.

Being charitable: it shows the wavering quality of superhero films in recent years as Disney keeps trying to push more and more movies and shows out the door pushing their vfx houses beyond their limits chasing perpetual unsustainable profit growth.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they were the two most recent Marvel movies (even if one of them was made by a different studio).

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Ah, I see. I think Madame Web isnt a good comparison anyway, since its a Sony flick.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because those were the last two comic book movies and the ones that started the whole "comic book fatigue" dialog.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

That "fatigue" conversation started way way earlier, at least with Eternals

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And that's just from Thursday/Friday/Saturday.

Sunday could add another $50 to $75 million domestic.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I've never even heard of the marvels until this year and madame web never at all. I'm never super excited about comic based movies, but ones I've never heard of even less. Plus I always feel like I would have to know a whole bunch of backstory from comics or past movies to know what is going on.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

They were going to do a sequel to Captain Marvel and then decided to shoe-horn in two Captain Marvel adjacent characters from the Disney+ shows WandaVision and Ms. Marvel and call it "Marvels".

It probably would have been better if they had just done Captain Marvel as space Superman on her own.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You really don't. Most are designed to be watched without the full context of other films behind them or it you need context they will fill you in.

If course if you've seen everything then it is beneficial.

Although, oddly enough, Deadpool REALLY is made for those that grew up with the Fox Marvel films.