this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
240 points (98.4% liked)

Fairvote Canada

743 readers
2 users here now

Matrix Chat


What is This Group is About?

De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?


The unofficial non-partisan Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.

🗳️Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.


Le mouvement non officiel et non partisan de Lemmy visant à introduire la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.

🗳️Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.




Related Communities/Communautés Associées

Resources/Ressources

Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles



Content Moderation Policies

We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.


Politiques de modération de contenu

Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] natecox@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is Ontario First-Past-the-Post? Because if it is, no surprises there.

Ranked choice now, please.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m down for proportional representation (PR) for voting in elections, with each voter having a single transferable vote (STV).

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are many voting systems. PR is nice, but almost any of them would be better than FPTP.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, honestly it's just a question of whichever is easiest to enstate. They all allow for 3rd parties which is the main thing here – breaking the duopoly on power.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly, seriously just give me anything.

Stv works in Australia + Malta and Alberta used it until the 50s, mmpr in New Zealand and Welsh + Scottish parliament. Australia also has instant runoff for the lower chamber so like we don't have to use one form everywhere, use what makes sense. I'm pointing out commonwealth nations as we generally all have some form of Westminster parliament, but there's other examples too, Germany uses mmpr afaik

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago

Germany has a better way of representing the people but it also has its problems. We have a comically big parliament because of the way our system works

Exactly, seriously just give me anything.

Even frickin' random ballot would have advantages over FPTP.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes it is, further our current premier made it illegal for municipalities to use other voting systems because he doesn’t want people to understand them (London was going to use ranked iirc)

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would the political leadership change an election system in a way that would hurt their odds of winning reelection?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He’s provincial not municipal

The system was going to be for council/mayor and he made it so they don’t have authority to change their own systems

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And 6 million didn't vote.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Choose one:

  • [ ] Hard Right Financial Elites
  • [ ] Slightly Less Right Financial Elites
  • [ ] Slightly Left Financial Elites
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's even worse for Americans... Most of us DO vote against our own conservative party (as a unified, majority group), and yet we still deal with them running our government.

I understand that a lot of our bullshit bleeds into Canada these days as well... We're sorry our worst are doing that. We don't send the best ideas or people up there, clearly. Just a bunch of racist, xenophobic, bad hombres.