this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
64 points (87.2% liked)

Games

41460 readers
577 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think I've ever once looked at Halo 2 and thought it looked worse than Halo 1.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I remember it looking lower poly, but they definitely had more effects going on than Halo 1 did.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it was less tuned. Halo 1 was BB King, Halo 2 is Papa Roach

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't tell if that's an insult or a compliment.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Well it’s definitely both

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Halo 1, 2, and 3 all looked fine. Halo 4 and up all look like shit, cuz 343 made them shit.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I actually remember being impressed with Halo 4’s graphics. The campaign looked good anyway.

[–] Sinuousity@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Environment and character work was generally great in 4, but just look at that Phantom 'explodes' in the very first mission... It's remarkable how weak some of the presentation in the game was. While 4 did have some talented people working on the franchise still, it was obvious by then that 343 no longer cared and QA was absent. Also way way too much lens flare

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Halo 4 only looks good if the only thing you care about is how quickly your GPU can fry an egg. The art style is ugly, none of the levels are lit in a way that makes any sense, and the new designs look dumb.

There is nothing good about Halo 4, including the graphics.

[–] BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Halo 4 had great graphics to run on a damn Xbox 360. But yeah, they lost in the design department, imo I felt too much felt like plastic/artificial instead.

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

A lot of over-designed armour and equipment, too. Especially in multiplayer.

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Agreed. High res is not the same thing as good graphics. The Halo 1 remaster is another great example of that; the og graphics look SO much better

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The video details how all of Halo 2's assets were made with stencil shadows in mind after the bungie devs saw it in Doom 3. However, the OG Xbox ended up not having the processing power to do those critical, deep shadows, so they returned to the flat lighting of the first Halo, which resulted in a much less stylized game. The video creator shows how the game was meant to be experienced by showing all of the different character models in one of the few places in the game that retained a small section of dynamic shadows, which really drives his point home of how much better it would've looked overall.

Also @ampersandrew@lemmy.world

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That could be the case and it can still look better than Halo 1.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is a really interesting video. My first question would be why this issue wasn't caught early by the devs. The Id Tech 4 engine at the time was considered absolutely cutting edge stuff, and (as the video identifies) even it had to be constrained to interior environments. Halo 2 was using an iteration off of Halo:CE's engine, so unlike Doom the engine wasn't specifically built to do those shadow tricks. Who thought that they could rework an existing engine to do shadows like this, get it to work better than Id Tech 4 at doing outdoor spaces, and then get it optimized enough that not high end computers but X-Boxes could run it? And do all of that on top of actually just making the game itself inside of a market driven timeline?

Laid out like that, it looks like a crazy idea. I wonder if the art style was developer or management pushed, and who allowed it to get far enough that models were made with it in mind.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think The Chronicles of Riddick on Xbox was running on idTech doing all them effects on the OG xbox. It looked fantastic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xu5BH4j0K1A

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Apparently the games that did use that technique, like idtech games and splinter cell, generally all had small environments that were within the limitations of the hardware, where as halo 2 had massive environments that stressed it too far with the lighting active.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's great, though it doesn't really address the questions. I suspect only higher up people in the Halo 2 development could answer them.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

The sounds are also worse. Halo 1 had bass, sounded badass.

Halo 1 sounded like using automatics and shotguns and off-road gas guzzlers to battle armor-clad plasma-wielding aliens.

Halo 2 sounded like whoopie cushions going off and alumunum cans being crushed. It was just less of a visceral feel. pttt pttt!