this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
82 points (90.2% liked)

politics

25552 readers
3318 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Consortiumnews.com

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Right after its independence from Britain, India brought the Zamidari Abolition Act which seized lands from feudal landowners and distributed it to farmers working under them. Such acts are now unthinkable for some reason, as if property rights are some divine gift.

Corporations should not have rights to own residential land. Even for individuals there should be limits on the land they can own. Would you hoard water? Air? No, then how can you hoard land?

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

Would you hoard water?

Nestle has entered the chat

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The only reason nobody hoards air is that we haven't yet figured out how to do so effectively.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When we do, I hope we secure it. Maybe a planetary shield with a sophisticated combination, like 12345.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So the combination is one, two, three, four, five? That's the stupidest combination I've ever heard in my life! That's the kinda thing an idiot would have on his luggage!

[–] theuberwalrus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don't know what you're talking about, I only see *****

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Plenty of them do have a safety net. If you're "too big to fail," you get bailed out by the government.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

So much wisdom seems impossible from a dingleberry. Lol

[–] iyaerP@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ban corporate landownership.

Full stop.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Good luck with that, they have significantly more rights and fewer responsibilities than people here. Hell, corporations actually enjoy a robust social safetynet here, unlike people. Speculative investment, aka gambling at the rich lad insider rigged casino, is taxed significantly less than actual productive labor.

We humans without significant capital are second class citizens. If corporations could ride buses, we would be forced to give up our seats to protect our beloved economy.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Corporations are already attempting to buy up the land to put up timeshares. The ashes were still smoking when the vultures swooped in.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who’s gonna buy them? Aquaman. /s

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

That's why they're timeshares. It's to scam idiots.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The old fashioned word for "disaster capitalism" is "profiteering".

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They should be afraid, and resigned to that fate. We worship our capital holders and never place limits on them.

They aren't profiteers, they're our benevolent job creators!

Greed doesn't exist. They're just exhibiting rational self-interest!

They aren't being unethical opportunists. they're acting in the best interests of shareholders!

(probably not you, btw) https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/18/the-wealthiest-10percent-of-americans-own-a-record-89percent-of-all-us-stocks.html

They aren't hurting society for private benefit. They're protecting our beloved economy!

We have always been at war with Eurasia.

[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

This is the real conspiracy theory here. Maybe not even a conspiracy but hopefully won’t become the awful truth. I hope we are getting them the relieve needed now and after the dust settles.

Never heard of consortiumnews.com

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/consortium-news/

"Mostly factual". Alright they check out

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Genuinely thinking about moving to Maui if the cleanup drops prices enough.

My house is more than double it's value and im pretty sure I could break even to buy there, and I work remotely.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That’s a 👍