this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
218 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"So, you mean they're homophobic?"

"Well, no, but-"

"So they're misogynistic? Racist? Transphobic? Ableist???"

"N-no, actually they enforce strict banning on all those things, BUT-"

"So they bully people into suicide?"

"Nooo, they require content warnings for even mentions of suicide, BUT!"

"...Yes?"

"I saw one of them say 'death to nazis!"

"So they're the opposite of 4Chan?"

"NO!"

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If this is the 4chan of the left then where is my zip file entitled "Dungeons and Dragons rulebooks" but is just gigabytes of dolphin porn?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cherufe@hexbear.net 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

This is just a site to make posts about piss

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago
[–] Weedian@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Federation rules. I love our posters not giving an inch to libs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] macabrett@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I tried to reason with that user and was met this morning with a post that convinced me I shouldn't have tried to reason with that user.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buh@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Enver_McTim@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Ngl I don't fully understand the point of content warnings in so many cases where the warning is equally as potentially triggering as the content itself.

I get it if the content of the post is actually worse, but in a lot of cases it's like, people already mention the same exact thing they're giving a warning for... by saying it in the warning. Example:

"CW: SAThey were sexually assaulted"

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

tbh i find abbreviations to be fine for my PTSD, as a survivor of SV. sticking to abbreviations like SA and SV and nsfw tagging posts (hide nsfw in your profile) will help limit exposure. im a big proponent of NSFW tags and abbreviations to keep our more vulnerable users safe, though i would like to see more tags in the future and even tags for comments that can hide chains. i guess the abbreviations make it more clinical rather than personal for me.

spoilerthe slightly longer r word is very bad for me though

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jungekatz@lemm.ee 29 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›