this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
169 points (95.2% liked)

collapse of the old society

1363 readers
1 users here now

to discuss news and stuff of the old world dying

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 year ago

But at least we built a lot of value for the shareholders

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I keep telling my daughter she's likely to see society collapse during her lifetime.

It's better she is prepared for it than to be caught by surprise, as so many others will be.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get not being ignorant of upcoming issues but I doubt she forgot. Probably don't need to repeatedly reminder her, ratcheting stress

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Depends how you look at it. Knowing things have a high likelihood of getting bad helps her focus on skills that are not dependant on a thriving and stable society.

Besides that, she is a well adjusted teenager, who is happy with life, has good friends and recognizes unhealthy behaviour in others.

As with everything else I teach her, this is just a small part of the whole that allows her to keep thriving in this world, while maintaining good mental health. I think most people would consider themselves blessed to have a teenage girl this well adjusted.

Protecting children from the truth is the unhealthy approach. You don't doom and gloom it, you explain it it calm rational. There is a method to the healthy sharing of information that doesn't crush a person's psyche.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right. I'm not saying "protect from the truth" I'm just saying non-adult minds do not work like ours and one should be very cautious to not impart constant underlying stressors, as we cant perceive how they are consumed. Children don't have the same "rational" capacity adults do

It sounds like you have a healthy dialog, so I'm just chatting.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I completely understand where you are coming from, especially with how many people only perceive and act in extremes.

[–] SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I keep thinking some of us are listening to Hari Seldon and are preparing for collapse and a coming dark era. Maybe many centuries of unrest at a minimum, and likely never rebounding to current population levels (not necessarily a bad thing).

This is a frequent topic in our family discussions. Where would be the safest place to go, globally?

Do you plan to relocate your family somewhere else?

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think we already live in one of the better places on earth. Not overburdened by too much population (1 million people in a province with the landmass of Great Britain) , lots of nature, and far from centres of war or possible nuclear fallout. We are not a strategic location and have access to unlimited fresh water. Winter is the biggest environmental threat here, not counting other humans of course.

[–] jorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The water makes you a strategic location

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Most of Canada has access to clean water sources. We have an insane amount of fresh water lakes and rivers. We're more likely to eat eachother than fight over water.

[–] SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

We aren't so lucky. Hurricane prone area with a heavy population.

But we have passports to six countries so we are carefully evaluating our options. It will likely be the Andean region.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

It’s only a matter of time.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's probably changed... for the worse

[–] derGottesknecht@feddit.org 6 points 1 year ago

Here is the report if anyone wants to read the original

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does this cause worse winters too, or will winter get warmer and shorter as time goes on?

[–] hazeebabee@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

It varies depending on location. A more accurate name would be global weirding. Some places will get wetter, some drier, some areas will get much warmer, some will have more extreme cold events.

We might see a shift in air currents making the Sahara desert move back to being a grassland and Europe could lose much of its rainfall. Established agriculture will likely have a hard time adjusting to the new climate and could cause global food scarcity.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

May the next society enshrine our mistakes.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago