this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
169 points (95.2% liked)

News

36993 readers
1880 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Neil Gaiman — the best-selling author whose work includes comic book series *The Sandman *and the novels Good Omens and American Gods — has denied sexual assault allegations made against him by two women with whom he had relationships with at the time, Tortoise Media reports.

The allegations were made during Tortoise’s four-part podcast Master: the Allegations Against Neil Gaiman, which was released Wednesday. In it, the women allege “rough and degrading sex” with the author, which the women claim was not always consensual.

One of the women, a 23-year-old named Scarlett, worked as a nanny to his child.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 79 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sleeping with the nanny less than half your age isn't a great start for a discussion of power dynamics in a sexual relationship.

I'm not going to assume anything either way, bo the women deserve to be heard, at the very least.

[–] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Agreed, but in my experience people in their early twenties can be surprisingly experienced and conscious kinksters, able to voice consent and negotiate intense situations. While people in their fourties can be incredibly insecure, unable to communicate their needs and insecurities, while still wanting to play.

It's a matter of experience, self-awareness and skills, and those don't come with age, but with work on yourself and education. We need so much more sex education and communication about these things.

The woman in question doesn't seem to be an experienced kinkster though, and she should totally be heard in any case. But the age argument distracts from the real issues, I believe.

[–] vidarh@lemmy.stad.social 43 points 2 years ago (9 children)

The age matters less than the power-dynamics of her being his nanny.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

People in their forties who are also massive global celebrities? I doubt he was especially insecure.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oops. You're right. I read 'forties' from the person I was replying to and wires got crossed.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One of the accusations was twenty years ago so 40s applies.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Either way, he was a big celebrity then and he is one now, so I don't think we can argue that this was some insecurity on his part.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I didn't mean him in that example, but the bottom of the power dynamic being 40, or 20.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

and only a couple hours after they first met...

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

You never had sex on the first date?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 79 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Gaiman is one of my favorite writers and I actually have stuff signed by him, so…yeah.

[–] genuineparts 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But he said in his statement that he's a Gaiman.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

Booo to the people that downvoted you.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago

This will make a friend of mine sad. She's a big fan. Sigh. Never meet your heroes.

[–] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Ugh. And I liked him as an author. Why can’t it be a crappy writer instead? Now I’m gonna feel bad every time I read one of his works. What an asshole.

[–] Hotmailer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Can someone define rape, cuz I'm genuinely confused. He didn't take their clothes off or force himself on them I gather.

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 years ago

Loosely, it's rape any time you have sex with someone who doesn't currently want to be having sex with you. That's pretty much the broadest possible terms.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At one point, she alleged that he penetrated her despite her objecting because she was in the midst of a urinary tract infection; the incident left her “screaming” in pain. Gaiman denied K’s allegations and told Tortoise he was “disturbed” by the accusations.

At least read the fucking thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›