this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024

481 points (98.4% liked)

Wholesome Greentext

650 readers

1 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

sjmarf@sh.itjust.works

481

Anon dates blind girl (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/wholesomegreentext@sh.itjust.works

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Image Transcription

(A 4Chan "green-text", with an image of giga-chad doing a thumbs-up)

Dating a blind girl

All of her friends are blind

Love that she holds my arm when we're out

Love that she eventually got used to my apartment and can now navigate around by herself

Love that her guide dog is super friendly and is always on the job to help her.

Love that her family sees me as a great person because her being blind doesn't bother me

Love that she doesn't use the internet because it's too much hassle

Love that she requests I read new books for her in my voice and record them so she has her own boyfriend audiobook library.

top 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Washington State has a digital braille library if anyone out there knows someone like Anon's GF.

https://www.sos.wa.gov/washington-talking-book-braille-library

It's available to anyone

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Washington State has a digital braille library

And since it’s a blue state, this library is unlikely to be viciously defunded or be legally/legislatively attacked by regressives.

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This maxes out the wholesome meter god damn.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look at how good of a person i pretend to be.

Jasss so wholesome

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How come they're pretending, in your opinion?

[–] zer0hour@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not that I necessarily agree, but probably because they made a post to "show off" instead of just enjoying it themselves. like, why share unless you want to get acknowledgement?

that's at least where I think they may be coming from

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Sometimes when you're happy you just want to share why you're happy

[–] lseif@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

waiting for the awful twist before i read the community name

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

>love she is so dependent on me

>love I can just take her into the woods and she can't say no, because of the implication

[–] uis@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Transcpibtion is usually done as ![transcribtion goes here](url to image goes here)

[–] sjmarf@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm aware of this - unfortunately, Lemmy doesn't allow transcription of the post image in this way, as it isn't part of the post body markdown. In Lemmy 0.19.4 or 0.19.5 (I'm not sure which) they added an actual alt_text field to posts for this (see here). Once sh.itjust.works updates to that version, I'll start using that field :D

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that shit doesn't just work.

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone call in Todd Howard!

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPN0qhSyWy8

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This is so cute, anon is adorable

[+] ralen@lemmy.zip -22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"doesn't use the internet" - thats a lie, blind people can use the internet with all these tts programs, a lot of which are simple to configure and use

[–] sjmarf@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It says "doesn't use the internet", not "can't use the internet". Whilst the internet has become more accessible over time through the use of screen readers etc, accessibility is unfortunately not considered a priority for many apps and websites. It's trickier to navigate the web as a blind person because websites are primarily designed to be looked at, not heard. It's not unreasonable that she might just not want to use it, even though she could learn to.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Have you ever seen those wheelchair ramps to nowhere and wondered why they exist? The answer is that they're the result of the Americans with Disabilities Act and lawsuits with consent decrees forcing governments to install them. (There really ought to be some more lawsuits and consent decrees forcing them to build the sidewalks connecting the ramps as well, but never mind that for now.)

Similarly, I look forward to the day when websites are finally held accountable for their failure to abide by the ADA and required to provide proper accessibility.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What’d the parent comment say?

Did it break rules?

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can check the modlog. The reason given is "automod," which seems quite bizarre to me, especially given that there are no objectionable keywords in the comment, and that it was removed 2 hours after it was made.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Blind" is ableist language, the preferred term is unsighted

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you use it as a noun to describe such a person, sure, but as an adjective it's perfectly acceptable and much more natural.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm just joking

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I hoped as much.

[–] sjmarf@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I didn’t remove it; the instance admins (the modlog says “automod”) did. They also got permanently banned from sh.itjust.works, apparently. I personally don’t think it was that bad - it sounds more like misunderstanding or ignorance than intent to cause offense. You’re welcome to look at the modlog to see what it said

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

? It's still up for me on boost

[–] sjmarf@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe Boost doesn't display that it's been removed? When a comment is removed, Lemmy stills sends the content of the comment to the frontend - it's up to your client to not display the content. The comment is definitely gone on the website frontend.

[–] tostiman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

This:

"doesn't use the internet" - thats a lie, blind people can use the internet with all these tts programs, a lot of which are simple to configure and use

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

whilst

Ew.

[–] ImWaitingForRetcons@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In theory, yes. In practice, most websites continue to be hostile for differently abled people, with the vast majority of websites continuing to have poor accessibility features. There might be a few things worth still going to the internet for, but not that many. 🤷‍♂️

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

It's a matter of motivation. It's not like the surface web is very worthwhile... Imagine if you were introduced to the web today. Twitter is on fire, Reddit is nonsense karma bots, common searches return unhelpful SEO garbage, YouTube has 10 ads to watch a 10 minute video... Why would you bother?

Doesn't mean there's not much worthwhile, it's just buried. They have braille readers, you can learn to use a screen reader at crazy speeds, and an endless amounts of sites use a consistent layout that a screen reader could easily handle, let alone specialty devices

It's just one more layer of bullshit that turns people away

[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is this comment removed? I thought Lemmy was supposed to be better about this sort of thing

[–] sjmarf@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The modlog says it was the sh.itjust.works automod. The comment content didn't contain any keywords that could have tripped it, so I'm not sure why it would have been set off. Maybe the automod is set to permanently ban recently created accounts that have a significant number of downvotes.

[–] sjmarf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely doesn't deserve a permanent ban imo, I don't think they were trying to cause offence.

@InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works

[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Just restored the comment and unbanned the user.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because a lot of the mods are power tripping dipshits. Usually they're the people who hated the mods over at reddit and now that they have power they run places how they want, which is usually with an authoritarian fist.

[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It's the circle of life