this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
1528 points (98.9% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] callyral@kbin.social 127 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What's weirder is that the bottom two are 6 feef apart

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 121 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Americans will use anything but metric

[–] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I wouldn't touch the metric system with a 10-foof pole.

[–] Rukmer@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

That made me laugh so hard I woke up my cats.

[–] BrownianMotion@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

The correct answer is 2.58 metres.

[–] rustydomino@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Or analytical geometry, for that matter.

[–] assa123 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This actually makes the problem solvable

edit: in 2-D. Even without the typo it was solvable in 3-D.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I'm a little sad nobody has done the correct math and it's been too long for me to do it off the top of my head lol.

A^2+B^2=C^2? What distance are the diagonals if the sides are 6' apart?

6x6 + 6x6 = sqrt72 = 8.49' !

I did it bois. Ty calculator for sqrt72...

[–] Kongpiler@lemm.ee 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now do the conversion factor from feef to feet!

[–] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago

The diagonal is 6ft. The side is 6 ft. So 6² + 6feef² = 6²

1 feef = 0ft

[–] exu@feditown.com 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Now, what's the length of the sides if the diagonals are 6ft?

[–] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Thats easy.
6 * 6 = 36
36 = a² + b²
Lets assume a = b
So a² = 18 = b²
a = b = 4,2426406871

[–] shootwhatsmyname@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

What if every initial value is unknown?

[–] MrMamiya@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

Roughly 4.24?

[–] Unanimous_anonymous@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

8.49'!~=116699.97'

I am a human, hear me rar.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It is SO HORRIBLE Stephen Hawking got on his feet.

[–] elboyoloco@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

*got on his feef

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

And out of his grave

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

How many dimensions is that picture though?

[–] dyen49k@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

It's a tetrahedron, duh

[–] dewritoninja@pawb.social 15 points 2 years ago

Kid named tetrahedron

[–] HumbertTetere@feddit.de 14 points 2 years ago

The blokes are obviously at different heights, that's all.

[–] yjr4df0708@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

1 feef is 12 finches

[–] sagrotan@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Why? The diagram is from above and they're shifted in 3 dimensions. Now draw that. I'm not asking. DRAW IT!

[–] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If the 6 feet is from head to head, couldn't you flip two people upside down?

[–] intelati@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Ha. I've always imagined it as six horizontal feet. Assume the heads are on the ground orientation agnostic

[–] MinekPo1@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Simple: they live in doom

[–] CaptionAdam@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I did the math the diagonal distance is ~8.5Ft

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it's closer to √72 Ft

[–] CaptionAdam@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Idk I just punched it in and rounded

[–] intrepid@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Oh! come on! How hard is it to social distance in a tetrahedron?

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What dimensional space are the people arranging themselves in?

But seriously, this reminds me of a time at my former (FAANG) employer where HR sent out a 40-minute video about not being an asshole and avoiding lawsuits.

12 minutes or so in, they say "as the number of people in a group increases, the number of potential 1:1 interactions increases exponentially." I thought "actually n(n-1)/2 but whatever", and finished the video intending to get on with my life.

My inbox was FULL of engineers who were irate. "HR have proven themselves to be fools!" "I expect the company to never ask me to waste my time on their bullshit again." "Once again non-technical people talking out their asses."

HR sent a global apology for the error, asked everybody to not watch the video while they fixed it, and released a patched version the next day.

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

HR should have replied with a "this was a test on how not to be an asshole and you've all failed. You must take the whole training again"

load more comments
view more: next ›