this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
76 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42946 readers
1459 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

a'la 2010, would any moons that survive then be considered 'planets' ?

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago

It'd need to be 13 to 80 times more massive to be a brown dwarf.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_dwarf

If it gained mass rapidly, most all the moons would likely destabilize since they'd have way too little velocity for the orbit they'd now be in. But if they sped up to accommodate, it'd depend on the density change of Jupiter. The fusion would push out material a bit, but the density would probably just increase because of the increased mass.

But if the density stayed the same, the radius would be 2.4 to 4.3 times larger than currently. With Jupiter having a radius of 70,000 km, that'd put it at 170,000 to 300,000 km radius. That'd put Metis and Adrastea inside 170, and Amalthea and Thebe inside 300. They'd already be heavily inside the jovian atmosphere, so they'd be toast. Io, Europa, and maybe others might also fall due to higher atmospheric drag at those levels.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moons_of_Jupiter

I think the rest of the moons would be planets then, and the solar system would be a binary system.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If memory serves, 2010 ignited Jupiter by crashing Saturn into it. But you'd actually need about 250 Saturns (or 85 Jupiters) worth of hydrogen to get the job done. A lot of the moons would be within that new super gas giant's roche limit even before fusion began.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah ... we did accidentally nuke that planet. Our bad.

in the movie the weird black rectangles started appearing in jupiters atmosphere. it might have had something to do with the aliens creating a sun for europa, which had some kind of organic life on it

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Go on universe simulator and find out.

[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

You mean the outside/real life?

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Im pretty sure none of Jupiters moons would survive. But I suppose if they did perhaps they would change classification from moon to planet, but I think planet classification now also depends on size, so depending on size they still may not qualify. I don't know if any of Jupiter's moons are larger thaan Pluto, Ceres, etc.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 8 points 1 year ago

The IAU's list of requirements to be a planet is:

  • Orbit a star
  • Be big enough that it becomes round
  • Clear the neighbourhood (meaning you're way bigger than anything else in your orbit)

The last one is the one that disqualifies Pluto. For comparison, Pluto is roughly 8% of the mass of the other stuff in its orbit (not including Neptune, given that their orbits cross), whereas Neptune is thousands of times more than the rest of its orbit. The closest non-planet to meeting this criterion is Ceres, which is roughly one third of the rest of its orbit (in the asteroid belt).

Based on this list, I think Jupiter's four biggest moons (Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto) would make the cut.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why wouldn't they survive? I think even if Jupiter gained enough mass to start fusion, it would not become significantly larger. It would just become more dense.

[–] Apollo42@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The moons would almost certainly fall into Jupiter or be thrown from its orbit if itsuddenly gained enough mass to become a star.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I assumed in this scenario that orbits would be left unchanged aside from orbital velocity - if we can magic Jupiter much bigger, we can magic the orbits too :P

[–] Apollo42@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean if we're talking magic now, then all bets are off haha

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure how else you would increase Jupiter's mass that much :P

[–] Apollo42@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We feed it everything else in the system except for the sun and hope it is appeased for another cycle :)

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The sun and Jupiter are pretty close in terms of density, and Jupiter would need to get at least an order of magnitude heavier to start fusion. I think it's just a coincidence that the outward pressure of the sun's fusion makes these numbers roughly line up.

Thirteen Jupiters seems to be a commonly-given lower limit for fusion, so let's go with that. To increase mass by thirteen times while maintaining density (and assuming the whole thing is a perfect sphere, which it obviously isn't), Jupiter needs to increase its radius by a factor of about 2.35. This increases its equatorial radius to about 168,000 km, which does swallow up the three innermost moons, but leaves the four big ones alone

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For the four remaining do you know if they'd be clear of the Roche Limit?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, good call, I didn't think of that! Assuming I did my sums right, the Roche limit probably destroys the fourth innermost moon, but it still leaves the big four (which are the fifth through to ninth in ascending order of size of orbit). They're quite substantially farther out than the prior four

There are also like eighty smaller moons even farther out, but they don't meet the roundness criterion to be a planet because they are too small

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They’re in an orbit that works with jupiters current mass. If Jupiter gained enough mass to trigger fusion then I would think that many of them would with fall in or be slung out of orbit.

I’d be interested to see if anybody has done the math though to see how that would all play out.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

Aside from the orbit change mentioned, the huge increase in stellar radiation would certainly blow much of the lighter elements including water away. The core and some residuals that might remain on the far sides would be all that's left.