this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
-33 points (22.0% liked)

Political Memes

9272 readers
1745 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If they want it I'm for it.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

California has never talked about succession. Texas on the other hand...

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Check again. Rural California has been gnashing their teeth trying to secede like crazy for years now. Wanting very badly to join the white supremacist in Idaho and Eastern Oregon. There's a lot of russian-backed astro Turf in it. But there is a real sentiment among the uneducated bigots.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't that California seceding from California?

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I'm sure many of them would like to stay in the union and continue to Leach off everyone else's resources. Constitutionally they can't. So it's ultimately the same thing as texas. Who only believe they have the ability to do so on a technicality they don't actually have.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't think the constitution says a portion of a state can't vote to make their own state or join another. It's how West Virginia was created after all. Though whether the other states recognize it as part of the union is up for debate.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Initially no. It is important to note that their statehood happened just as a the civil war was. And that post Civil War language was put in place to clarify that this was not an option going forward. Though I am not a lawyer myself. I've seen a number of lawyers actually versed in the topic discussing this.

Believe me I would love it if our state spanning metropolitan area could secede from the red States it's located in. Because we really don't get representation at the state level. That's reserved for fascists. But it's not an option that's on the table.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who is "they"?

This reads like a muck-raking post to me.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

At a guess?

The inbred rednecks up in the hills that soak up all the water for almonds and other crops that have no business being grown in a desert.

(This is, for the record, in distinction to most the rednecks that suck up all the water… these ones are just “extra”, if you understand.)

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It's a bullshit meme of an idea for traitors who want to fuck around and forget about the part where they will eventually find out.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Say goodbye to your lettuce supplies

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And 15% of your gdp lol

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/04/16/california-remains-the-worlds-5th-largest-economy/

If any given state could make a go of it on their own it's CA. Take that away from the USA and there would be some major shifts in the world economic policy. Why anyone would suggest such is a far fetched idea though.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As I said elsewhere, don't threaten us with a good time. We'd be fine. The rest of the US would be fucked.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, don't inflate yourself that much. CA is important but it's still dwarfed by the country as a whole. Losing somewhere around 10% of the GDP and population would suck, but it's not the solitary pillar holding things up either.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

More like 15% of GDP hah

I think the US is precarious enough that the loss of CA would make the US economy unrecoverable. I think the East Coast would also immediately secede, since without CA the country is in a state of permanent Republican rule. Chicago and Detroit would probably petition to join Canada. I think loss of California would be a blow the US could not recover from as a nation.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Literally every other state in the union would have to approve it, and the odds of that happening are next to zero

We might as well discuss how I feel about a beautiful woman materializing next to me and asking for an ice cream cone for a nice date, we'd be talking about roughly the same odds of occurrence.

[–] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Considering how everyone here is predicting horrendous things if Trump wins, I'm surprised seccession isn't a more popular idea amongst the Californians here.

We're simultaneously being told that Trump is going to introduce death camps to the USA, but also that no one would want to leave the USA because that's crazy talk.