this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
125 points (99.2% liked)

News

36993 readers
1801 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Electric vehicle maker Fisker filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, the second electric startup to do so in the last year as even industry leaders struggle to lure more buyers beyond the early adapters of the technology.

Fisker Group Inc. said in a filing with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware that its estimated assets are between $500 million and $1 billion. It estimated liabilities are between $100 million and $500 million, with between 200 and 999 creditors.

“Like other companies in the electric vehicle industry, we have faced various market and macroeconomic headwinds that have impacted our ability to operate efficiently,” the company said in a prepared statement late Monday. “After evaluating all options for our business, we determined that proceeding with a sale of our assets under Chapter 11 is the most viable path forward for the company.”

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is Fisker's second bankruptcy

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)

With 3 bankruptcies they get become eligible for a free 8oz frozen yogurt with choice of topping.

[–] Nasom@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Nasom@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But the toppings contain potassium benzoate…

[–] Lighttrails@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] aniki@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But the teenager working the frozen yogurt stand hasn't washed their hands.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Penis fingers are always bad.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What if they've lost their bankruptcy card?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If they bring their prior bankruptcy court rulings to Customer Service between the hours of 10am and 5pm Eastern Time, their card can be reissue. Note: this is a one time courtesy, and will not be repeated.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

But can they get it punched like the one they had lost already? It had 2 punches...I saw it with my own 👀.

[–] psyc@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lordstown Motors was the other one to file for bankruptcy according to the article. Admittedly hadn’t heard of them

[–] Indie59@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They were a startup that tried to keep the GM plant in Lordstown running after GM downsized. Their original business model was EV conversion packages for standard IC cars, but wanted to keep jobs in the area so they tried to grow a business into fleet vehicles.

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'll add on to this, they got a massive partnership with Foxconn, and then Foxconn basically screwed them on it.

*Basically sold themselves to Foxconn

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Foxconn doing Foxconn things.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Will no one stand up to the business-killing menace that is Marques Brownlee?

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

That is what real journalism is supposed to look like. Give an honest review to serve the viewers.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Car goes for about 30k and has great range. Good price for a startup. Solely doing SUVs, which I don’t love, but it seems to be a decent offering for the price.

[–] Mcduckdeluxe@reddthat.com 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The quality was awful though, tons of issues with those cars. They might have been able to get through it if they had more money but they don't.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

They probably should’ve gone with simpler software and focused more on the fundamentals. Like they could be forgiven for not having all the self driving features at launch but an unreliable key is pretty bad.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm also not especially interested in EV startups at the moment. They could take decades to overtake big automakers, if ever. It's the big automakers that need to be convinced to invest in EV production.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Regulate monopolies.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Fisker is the "special child" of the EV world.

[–] brianary@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Somebody is really pushing an anti-EV narrative.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

More an Anti-computer-system-that-happens-to-have-wheels narrative.

I want a car. I want it to turn on, take me from point A to B, and maybe play some music or an audio book while I’m driving. It should tell me how fast I’m going, and how much further I can go before it needs to recharge or refuel. Give me a few buttons for basics like turning on the heat, AC, lights, and the windshield wipers.

That’s it. I just want an affordable car that can take me somewhere. None of these EV manufacturers are doing that. They all focus on software packages to set them apart from the rest, when if they just focused on making a usable, affordable car, they’d corner the market.

Let them fail until someone makes something that actually does what it’s supposed to.

[–] brianary@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I hear you, too many are SUVs or "crossovers" (still "light trucks" for the purposes of scamming gov't regulations) as well.

But I'm pretty happy with my Leaf. 🤷