this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
249 points (93.4% liked)

politics

25290 readers
2884 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The House voted on Wednesday to block the U.S. from funding the reconstruction of Gaza, whose destruction was financed by the U.S. to a large degree.

Other Republicans filed amendments combating the movement to boycott, divest, or sanction Israel for its illegal occupation of Palestine.

The provision was introduced by Reps. Brian Mast, R-Fla.; Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y.; and Eli Crane, R-Ariz., as an amendment to the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, the annual defense budget. While Democrats opposed the amendment, which passed by a simple voice vote, they did not request a recorded vote.

Among the amendments with Democratic sponsors are ones expressing support for joint military ventures between the U.S. and Israel.

Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla., for his part, filed an amendment to require an assessment of the accuracy of the Gaza Ministry of Health’s death toll accounting. Over the last eight months, supporters of Israel have pointed to the fact that Hamas — as Gaza’s governing entity — controls the health ministry as a way to undermine its death count. Nonetheless, the Ministry of Health’s figures have in the past been corroborated by the United Nations, Doctors Without Borders, and even the Israeli government itself.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (48 children)

If you don’t like how Congress represents you, vote in congressional elections. Democratic congressional election turnout is consistently less than 50%.

Make note of your state election dates and vote for change.

https://ballotpedia.org/Elections_by_state_and_year

load more comments (48 replies)
[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obviously this is cruel and the republicans can go fuck themselves. But also it would be quite hilariously stupid for the US to pay to destroy Gaza and pay to rebuild it.

I would say help rebuild it, but perhaps they should have reconsidered the destroying part. But hey what do I know. Something something important ally in the region, just a little smidge of genocide and apartheid. All good nothing to see here

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We did exactly that in Iraq and Afghanistan. To add insult to injury, VP Dick Cheney’s company, Haliburton Oil, got the rebuilding contracts.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Oh how Haliburton has fallen, they should have a $20 bil bid to rebuild their schools and infrastructure...

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

While Democrats opposed the amendment, which passed by a simple voice vote, they did not request a recorded vote.

Before you blame this on republicans, Dems didn't even challenge it for a vote so they had to put their names on it.

They just fucking stood there.

Wonder why Hakeem Jefferies didn't even try...

https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/hakeem-jeffries/summary?cid=N00033640

If you wonder why pro Israel Dems keep getting to the general where Dem voters have no option but voting for them:

That has made AIPAC the biggest source of Republican money flowing into competitive Democratic primaries this year, according to a POLITICO analysis of campaign finance data — and drawn outrage from the left over what it sees as GOP meddling in Democratic contests.

Nearly half of AIPAC donors to Democratic candidates this year have some recent history of giving to Republican campaigns or committees.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/09/aipac-republican-donors-democratic-primaries-00162404

Anyone want to guess what US politician has taken more money than anyone else from pro-Israel lobbyists?

And yes, I'm aware AIPAC isn't required to register as an agent of a foreign government, they get an exception.

The only reason it exists is because the prior group did have to register as a foreign agent in 1962. So they rebranded and donated to the people in charge of deciding who goes on that list, so AIPAC has never had to go on that list.

This has been an issue for over 60 years and there's no rational excuse to keep ignoring it.

Edit:

I should have presented the way for Dems to stop this:

In the United States House of Representatives, the filibuster (the right to unlimited debate) was used until 1842, when a permanent rule limiting the duration of debate was created.[70] The disappearing quorum was a tactic used by the minority until Speaker Thomas Brackett Reed eliminated it in 1890.[71] As the membership of the House grew much larger than the Senate, the House had acted earlier to control floor debate and the delay and blocking of floor votes. The magic minute allows party leaders to speak for as long as they wish, which Kevin McCarthy used in 2021 to set a record for the longest speech on the House floor (8 hours and 33 minutes) in opposition to the Build Back Better Act.[72][73]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster

Republicans did it for 8.5 hours just a few years ago...

Jefferies agrees with Republicans on this though.

Which is one of the big complaints about current Dem leadership. They only fight if they're 100% sure they'll win. Voters want politicians willing to fight even if it's hard and losing is possible.

We can't fight facism like this, because they fight every battle even if they don't have a chance of winning.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 40 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I'm sorry, "before you blame this on republicans"? Republicans vote for Horrible Policy, pass it, but we should blame it on democrats for not ...calling for a recorded vote? Yeesh.

Democrats didn't have the votes. You don't like this result, vote out republicans.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

givesomefucks covertly attacks Democrats in every comment. It’s often a baseless argument, beginning with some truth. They start making a good point, then twist it into a veiled criticism of Biden or Democrats, even when it’s the fault of Republicans or entirely apolitical.

In this case you’re correct. The Republican majority in the House makes a vote pointless.

Ironically, the same message givesomefucks is spreading will disengage people who may otherwise increase Democratic representation in government, leading to actual positive change.

They may just want to ensure they have something to complain about next year.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow, not a word about the Republicans that introduced the measure to block funding and who hold a majority in the House.

It’s clear which party and which presidential candidate is a better choice for people who care about Gaza and want to resist right-wing regimes (such as Netanyahu) worldwide. The Democratic one.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›