Ambitious marketing. I think they're still closer to self driving than competing systems, but "full self driving" is definitely a misleading name for what the software can currently do. We are gradually seeing more drives with zero disengagements, so the technology is slowly getting there.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Zero disengagement is exactly what the drivers should be doing in its current state and why it shouldnt be called full self driving.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, I think we are using term "disengagement" slightly differently. A disengagement generally refers to a human driver disengaging FSD as a manual override, not a human driver being disengaged with the task of driving.

[–] Nogami@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Fucking lawyers.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=RAzulqSvJxI

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=RAzulqSvJxI

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.