this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
204 points (97.2% liked)

World News

49866 readers
1705 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chiquita Brands was ordered Monday by a Florida jury to pay $38.3 million to the families of eight people killed by a right-wing paramilitary group in Colombia, which the banana grower had funded for years during that country's violent civil war.

Chiquita had previously acknowledged funding the paramilitary group, pleading guilty in 2007 after the U.S. Department of Justice charged the company with providing payments to what the agency labeled a "terrorist organization." The group, the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia, or AUC, received payments from Chiquita from about 1997 through 2004, which the company had described as "security payments" during the country's internal conflict.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice to know that if you work for a company that can afford to pay the fine, you can literally just straight up kill people(*) and pay the money and it's all good

(*) certain types of people at least

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

That's been a thing for a while.

When the military sees a problem that can only be solved by war crimes they literally just hire contractors to do them.

But you don't have to be the US government to hire private companies to do war crimes for you. Any citizen* can hire private military contractors to go out and do war crimes for them.

*A citizen is anyone with a net worth of greater than 500 million dollars.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Every time it caused a coup that we know about.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So... Some executives are going to jail, right? Right?

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

By jail do you mean getting fat bonuses?

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Nobody will actually be punished and they get a tiny fine.

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm very confused that this is happening now. I thought it happened a long time ago (them being found liable I mean). It's crazy to me that it's taken this long for such a pitiful punishment. It is good though that people are being reminded once again how shitty they are. Maybe we can impact their bottom line somehow (doubtful)

[–] manucode 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is about Chiquita's activities in the late 1990s and early 2000s, not about the 1928 coup in Honduras which was funded by Chiquita, then called United Fruit Company.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see a hot new name drop coming in.

[–] manucode 2 points 1 year ago

Un-ited Fru-eet Comp-any? Noone at Chiquita has ever heart of this thing before.

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True...but that was still decades ago

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know how every once in a while there's an article going "man, check out all this illegal fucked up shit the CIA was doing 20 years ago, sure is great they stopped and don't do anything illegal and fucked up anymore", and the date they stopped doing the illegal shit is always "20 years ago", regardless of when the article is published?

Well, that.

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You bring up an excellent point that I hate very much

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I thought it happened a long time ago