this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
219 points (99.5% liked)

News

37007 readers
2317 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Group, known as Florida Freedom Fund, launched in May and will also be involved in school board races

The Florida governor, Ron DeSantis, has launched a political action committee that is targeting popular ballot amendments on abortion access and marijuana legalization that will be voted on in November.

The group, known as the Florida Freedom Fund, launched in May, Politico first reported. The committee is chaired by James Uthmeier, DeSantis’s chief of staff who was previously the Republican’s campaign manager during his unsuccessful presidential primary run.

In addition to targeting ballot initiatives, the committee will get involved in school board races, Politico reported, citing an individual who is familiar with the group’s plans.

Florida Republicans have attempted to maximize their political control of local school boards, especially amid book bans and far-right education laws banning discussions of race and sexual identity being passed in the state, WUFT reported.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lurker8008@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The irony of "freedom" fund used to suppress freedom.

[–] clover@slrpnk.net 27 points 2 years ago

From the man who ran the "Never Back Down" campaign and was nearly the first to do so...

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ive noticed that almost every "freedom", or "patriot", named thing related to politics do just the opposite

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's definitely freedom. Freedom for Conservatives to tell everyone what they can and can't do in their own homes.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Same with "War on Drugs" or "War on Terror". I would like to congratulate both Drugs and Terror for their victories. I bet if they declared a War on Housing the homeless population in the US would plummet.

[–] dmtalon 7 points 2 years ago

Came in to say exactly that... The Irony is thick, and likely unfortunately lost on people that will approve it.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

This just in: DeSantis is changing the official words prisons and jails to Freedom Centers. Their slogan is "Where Freedom meets people"

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As we all know, legal weed is super unpopular and every ballot initiative to legalize it fails because of that and Republicans never have to do any sort of legal tricks to cancel that out, so this will work for sure.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago

I love seeing them waste money on shit that is only going to drive turnout against them.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"freedom" here is 100% orwellian

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

I was thinking the same thing.

The problem is that honest names, like repression fund or authoritarianism fund, don't score well in marketing research.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don’t understand why it’s legal to make a PAC and have your chief of staff head it.

To be fair I don’t understand why PACs are legal at all, but whatever.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

So much freedom.

[–] nnullzz@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Let’s see the mental gymnastics on this one, because I know quite a few hardcore republicans that loooove themselves some weed.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Let’s see the mental gymnastics on this one, because I know quite a few hardcore republicans that loooove themselves some weed.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” - Frank Wilhoit

So those hardcore week smoking republicans want to be in the first group, and want everyone else to be in the second. If weed was legal it would collapse both into a single group. Republicans don't want that.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

The irony of this.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Its nice to know that rule about republican names holds true. If it has freedom in its name. It is trying to take freedoms away from someone they don't like.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

For fucks sake ron

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

A small man screaming "I'm still relevant!" as the doors begin to close on him