this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
80 points (93.5% liked)

News

31486 readers
2965 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago

He doesn't support women's health.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kristi, he'd grind you and every woman up into hamburger and feed it to your surviving dogs if it got him one more vote so he could avoid prison for four more years. Give it up.

[–] myster0n@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago

I think you meant "hamberders"

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he should pick Airbud to show he supports canine health.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"There's nothing in the rules that says a dog can't be vice president"

  • SCOTUS, soon
[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obviously would have to be 35 dog years old, but that shouldn't be a problem

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually, is there such a requirement for VP? You don't have to meet the requirements to be in the chain of succession, you just get skipped.

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is. The Twelfth Amendment explicitly says that the Vice President must meet the same eligibility requirements to become President. Which, as it currently stands, means at least 35 years old, a natural born citizen, and resided in the US for the last 14 years.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, and so Air Bud's VP prospects have been sadly dashed.

Turns out there is a rule.

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 year ago

We're talking about dogs here. Do you seriously think we could skip a good boy?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he chooses a female VP, he will take the blonde with the big tits and personally verified blowjob qualities.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Are you suggesting that his idiot lawyer during his trial could give good blowjobs? Because of her skill is a lawyer is anything to go by, she's not good at anything.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m sure it’s a complete coincidence that her advice happens to be self-serving. Yup, total coincidence.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Trump would choose dog health over women’s health.

You’re SOL Noem. Give it up…

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I don't know, he really hates both. I'm not sure which he hates more.

[–] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Trump would only choose his own health and let everyone else die but it’s a sacrifice he is willing to make.jpg

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

So would I, honestly. Over mens health too, for that matter.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can always dust off Palin. That worked so well the first time.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Last time it was at odds with the presidential candidate. This time they both would fit right in with each other.

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it will also show he doesn't support animal health.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well I mean we already know that he doesn't like pets and animals hate him. So it would be in character. But he would have to make it a crime somehow for it to really make sense.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

lol. lmao. Dare I say, ROFLCOPTER.