this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)

movies

22818 readers
5 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

28 Years Later

28 Years Later is an upcoming post-apocalyptic horror film directed by Danny Boyle, from a screenplay he co-wrote with Alex Garland. Produced by Columbia Pictures in association with BFI, DNA Films and Decibel Films, it serves as a sequel to both 28 Days Later (2002) and 28 Weeks Later (2007). It stars Cillian Murphy reprising his role from 28 Days Later, alongside Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Jodie Comer, Ralph Fiennes, and Jack O'Connell.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TrashGoblin@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I loved 28 Days Later, thought 28 Weeks Later was just okay, and have basically no interest in 28 Years Later.

[–] jackmarxist@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

28 Centuries later is going to be great though

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

These kind of sequels are maybe 50/50. The new Blade Runner was great, for example.

[–] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Zombie movies just aren't the same after covid19. aware

[–] CamillePagliacci@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

"Hah yeah. People acting like idiots and basically deliberately infecting people with a deadly disease? The government would crack right down on that"

[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unless I misunderstood the concept of the older movies, won't this just be a movie about how humanity is rebuilding but uh oh actually there's still zombies for some contrived reason

This is a rage virus one not a magical undead corpse one right

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is a rage virus one

Yes.

actually there's still zombies for some contrived reason

My wild hunch is that somehow dormancy is involved. But I can't think of a plot that isn't nonsense or (very) silly. All I've got is that maybe a small island is involved. It's "free from any trace of the virus". Until one day the virus arrives after there's a zombie outbreak on a boat that crashes on the shore.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

TBH after the initial premise of zombies itself being unrealistic, I don't find the addition of a virus returning to be problematically unrealipstic.

[–] Tiocfaidhcaisarla@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Anti-Month ass