this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
253 points (97.0% liked)

News

36909 readers
2708 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Gotta end religious tax exempt status. Yesterday.

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

This should be common knowledge.

The SPLC says in its report that the “hard right” have only strengthened their resolve to undermine democratic standards in the U.S. government and promote Christian nationalist, white supremacist ideals in the years since July 4, 1776.

Ftfy

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 21 points 2 years ago

Why is "Threats" in double-quotes? The fact that they are "threats" is not in question - these are not "alleged threats"?

I see that it comes from the article, but that only pushes back my question as to why the article does that. It also puts "hard right" and "all-out" (and "holy war" and "race war" and "dangerous" and "evil" and "demonic" etc.) in quotes too, which should not be, but those at least are all more discretionary, whereas putting "threats" in quotes like that calls into question their validity.

[–] user91@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Not to minimize the danger but I think it's the death throws of a group that sees their membership counts falling year over year. Religious participation is decreasing, globally, and they damn well know that.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Everyone has to vote. My neighbor said the other day flippantly I don’t do politics. WTF??? It’s not like it used to be twenty years ago. It’s like life and death now.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

It was life and death 20 years ago too. Why the fuck do you think we're in this situation?

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well sure, but let's not throe the baby out with the baptism water, eh?

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Probably just not knowing how it is spelled. Which isn't the same thing as bone apple tea.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, you’re right. It was just the closest thing I could think of

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Kill em all, let god sort em out.