this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
31 points (97.0% liked)

Science

13166 readers
1 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's a fern.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was really hoping this article would say more about what this means, but this is all we get...

Intriguingly, bigger isn’t always better when it comes to genomes, the team says. Large-genomed plants tend to have slower growth, require more nutrients and perform photosynthesis less efficiently. As such, it’s thought that T. oblanceolata is bumping up against the upper limits for genome size.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how much of that generic code is actually important and how much is junk.

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was wondering the same.

And... if these ferns are superior to us in some way. 🤣

[–] B0rax@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

In some ways, yes. They aren’t susceptible to political propaganda for example.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

A humble fern species known as Tmesipteris oblanceolata

Dang. Okay, I wasn’t expecting a fern to have 50x human DNA

[–] AnomalousBit@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

DNA polymerase goes brrrrrrrrt

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Sequencing that would be a bitch