this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Mycology

4339 readers
14 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Four days ago I added some purchased oyster spawn to five jars containing popcorn or rye (after sterilizing of course). The next day I noticed these white spots on the kernels of only one jar. For reference, the pink oyster spawn in this jar was also added to a jar of rye, and there is no sign of these spots in that jar, so I believe the spawn itself was fine. Transfer was done in a still-air box, and this wasn't even the last jar I did, so I'm not really sure if it is contam or not?

One thing that strikes me (and I'm not sure if you can see the detail in this pic), I have seen white spots like this on sweet corn, which I believe is also a fungus, but the popcorn kernels were boiled for 20 minutes, dried for a couple hours, then put in a pressure cooker for 90 minutes at 15psi, so I don't know how any fungus would have remained in the jars?

Regardless, I was wondering if anyone had seen something like this before, and if the jar is likely a loss? The oyster spawn is actually growing growing, you can see one cluster starting right in the center, and it seems like it's cleaning the kernels that it expands to? This is my first time trying to expand spawn so I thought I'd ask for opinions on this...

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And on another note, any idea why Lemmy isn't showing the image in the URL link I added to this post? It's the full-sized jpeg of the same picture I added in the OP.

[–] Sal@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it would be nice to make it clickable by default. One way is to it manually, by selecting it and making it a hyperlink, or manually writing the code:

[![](https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/81a67626-7bfa-44f7-b119-5b168380eb30.jpeg)](https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/81a67626-7bfa-44f7-b119-5b168380eb30.jpeg)

EDIT: Sorry! I misunderstood the question the first time I read it.

It looks to me like Lemmy does not understand that it should treat the 'JPG' extension the same way as a 'jpg'.

Looking at the source code, there is a line that identifies an image as an image by its extension here:

const imageRegex = /(http)?s?:?(\/\/[^"']*\.(?:jpg|jpeg|gif|png|svg|webp))/;

I think that this is a case-sensitive regex, and that the .JPG extension is not treated as a .jpg file by lemmy.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Erg that sucks... literally every digital camera I've owned has saved the pictures with an uppercase "JPG". Maybe I'll file a bug report on this. Thanks for letting me know though.

load more comments
view more: next ›