this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
246 points (93.9% liked)

News

31815 readers
2213 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 131 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depressing.

Thanks for saving a click though

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah! This "raw story" is fuckin cooked!

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

But it’s definitely rawdogging something,

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some Trump supporters are entrenched because of the fake "Biden crime family" narrative. They have to keep it going lest reality appear.

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never mind the 91 felonies their incoherent cult leader is facing.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol, right? It'd be a little believable if it was one or two, kinda like what they're doing to Hunter.... BUT 91????? Come on man

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's right we're entrenched. The news cycle did it, period

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

spoilerasdfasfasfasfas

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is not "cold political analysis" at all. She is still simping for Trump morons, by pretending anything connecting to Hunter Biden is somehow important for Biden voters. It is just Fox News pathetic attempt at trying to mitigate the Hunter Biden slander lawsuit.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

spoilerasdfasfasfasfas

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 53 points 1 year ago

I was about to vote for Hunter Biden this election but NOT ANYMORE!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And once again, I ask: Where is the NRA?

And where was the NRA when Philando Castile was shot?

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the NRA. They're trash. All my homies hate the NRA. They're a gun manufacturer lobbying group, not a gun rights group.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I'm aware. However, the members I've talk to insist otherwise.

That said, I don't know of any gun rights groups that came to advocate for either man- although I admit I don't follow the subject of gun rights groups closely.

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only members I know that support them can also explain 4H to me. They're heavy into the training side and own cows.

I don't think any have. I'm not sure any bother going against cops - regardless of the situation. They have nothing to gain by going after pigs.

Same with Biden. Some (hopefully) might support eliminating those idiotic laws, but they can only lose on that. It'd be actively harmful considering the pure ignorance that flows out of his father's mouth when he talks about firearms.

We need a prominent pro-self defense rights group that's anti-cop and not specifically conservative. Granted, starting one sounds like a good way to starve.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would say that if the NRA could make a big stink about Kyle Rittenhouse, they certainly could have made a big stink about Philando Castile. A legal gun owner getting killed for doing what he was supposed to do, what the NRA advises doing, in that situation should be exactly who the NRA should be making a big stink about if they were sincere, which they are not.

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree they're not, but Rittenhouse wasn't in a shootout with cops. There have been some situations where white people either got killed by cops in fucky situations or killed cops in fucky situations. I highly doubt any of the gun rights groups touch those.

I can't remember their names (I know) but one was an older defense contractor. A crackhead stole his truck, got popped, then claimed the drugs in the truck were the truck owner's. Pigs being pigs, they raid the old man and shoot him dead.

Another one was a guy who was ratted on by a CI. Another raid happens and a cop kicks out his lower door panel and gets killed by the home owner.

These are both 10 or 15+ years ago. I'll try hunting them down. I'm sure Reason has them archived.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Philando Castile didn't get in any sort of situation with the cops that he shouldn't have gotten into. I highly recommend you read about his case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Philando_Castile

That article talks about the NRA's tepid response.

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm familiar. Had a carry license. Told the cop. Followed orders. Cop got scurred and shot him.

The murderer is the cop.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe you should scroll down and see what the NRA had to say about the situation, since that's what I was talking about.

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be clear, I don't think they benefit saying anything that makes pigs look bad. Jumping through idiotic hoops to inhale cop dick is expected from the NRA.

Otherwise I'm confused about what I'm missing.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, so what is the point of a gun owner advocacy group that doesn't advocate for gun owners?

Because that was what I was saying.

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

I agree. The reality is most of them advocate for gun owners when the bad guys aren't cops. The NRA sucks money from real rights advocates to say moronic shit about video games causing gun violence.

I misunderstood your objection and that's on me for not clarifying.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

There’s so much useless noise coming from that channel that I can’t rely on anything I think I know about Hunter Biden. All I’m willing to say is that I’m pretty sure he’s a real person. Oh, and he may have owned a laptop at some point. That’s it.

They’re talking about a trial, but has he been officially indicted with anything?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

It was proven in congress with evidence that he has a fat fucking cock and likes to bang hot chicks.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He has actually had addiction issues in the past and I’m pretty sure he has gone through rehab more than once. But why that matters, I don’t know

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Buttery males!

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

He’s been charged with gun stuff and tax stuff.