I’m sorry - this is just fucking stupid. Cars are becoming way too bogged down with shit like this that acts like a hovering parent who nags you constantly while having to know where you are all the time.
this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
131 points (94.0% liked)
Moving to piefed.lemmy.fan/c/weird_news - Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'
1617 readers
2 users here now
Weird News is moving to https://piefed.lemmy.fan/c/weird_news on Friday June 27th. Please subscribe to the new community before then.
Rules:
-
News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.
-
Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.
-
Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.
-
Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.
Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.
Communities We Like:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I want to crash my car into a brick wall every time it makes me click "okay" to the full screen warning that tells me it is my responsibility to keep my eyes on the road. Yeah, no shit, you fucking wanker.
load more comments
(3 replies)
If this passes in California, all their highways will just be a steady sound of vehicles horns.
the headline is very misleading. There is no beeping at other drivers, or honking of horns.
Just a notification to you, the driver of your own car if your car a) knows the local speed and b) is exceeding it by a set amount.
This notification can be disabled.
like, if you're in a 30 zone, and go 35, your satnav/gps will go "ding!" and a small light will go on the dash/lcd screen.
We just got an electric car that does this and it's annoying as fuck because it often messes up the speed limit and tells you that you are going too fast even though you are not.
My thoughts exactly. There’s no way it’s going to be correct for every situation. It can’t take into account changing road conditions.
It's not even just the changing conditions. It just has wrong speed limit data in some areas and spmetimes it says there is work being done on the road where there isnt and similar
California freeways are 65mph. Unless there is traffic, most drivers tend to go around 80mph. They will be constant.
In my opinion, this is trying to tackle the issue in a poor manner. People who are speeding already know that they are, so it's not like a beep or visual warning is going to cause them to change their behavior. It's trying to force a technical solution to a non-technical issue.
I just can't wait to see how quickly someone finds a way to bypass this nanny bullshit.
Unless there is traffic, most drivers tend to go around 80mph.
And they aren't constantly getting into accidents? Wild. Someone should tell the politicians that this might not be the source of the problem.
And they aren't constantly getting into accidents?
Nope. The major freeways in California are giant 8 lane straight lines. You could drive 100 mph on them and be perfectly safe. You can see 5 miles ahead of you, and there are no curves or anything to fuck you up. The 65 mph speed limit is just there so that they can write speeding tickets whenever they want more money.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Y'all trying to create more GOP'er with this asinine shit. Jesus Christ I'm tired of this nanny state shit.
load more comments
(28 replies)
Yeah absolutely fucking not. I control my car, not your fucking legislative whims!
load more comments
(5 replies)
There's a really good way to reduce speeding without dumb moves like this. Design the road for the speed you want. Most roads in the US are created first without speed limit concerns, only labeling them based on a weird metric of how fast cars drive through them. Then if they are going too fast, governments just put up more warning signs and call it a day.
There are many techniques in the road design handbook that can be used to make drivers subconsciously slow down for their own perceived safety. And it works! So let's do more of that and less of this "make car beep" nonsense.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I really hope this doesn't apply to freeways
Yeah like… how fast do you have to drive before the beeps? I always heard 5-10 over is standard
Article says 10mph over the limit
How does it determine the limit?
Also literally all this would do is startle everyone especially people who drive new cars and make residential areas louder.
Lmao, it won't honk the horn
Ohhhhhh I'm dumb
It's ok, I'm dumb too.
Most have GPS position and reference a database or they use cameras to see speed signs, sometimes both with one having priority over the other.
It isn't always accurate.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Atlantians will be devastated.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I’m opening an auto shop to make the beep sound change to “hell yeah, brother!”
the faster you go the louder "free bird" by lynryd skynryd plays
People will just pull whatever fuse it's on, or find a bypass
They won't even hear it over the Netflix they're watching on their phones.
On the phones? Friend, we have huge-ass screens in cars now. With 7.1 sound system
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
If they could automate vehicles this wouldn't be an issue. The current tech isn't there so what if we put them on tracks so they can't crash? We could make them bigger so lots of people could go at the same time and fewer vehicles would be on the road. You wouldn't even have to own it, they could have a regular schedule so you know where and when to ride in one!
Nah, that will never work. Beeping at a driver occasionally though, that will fix things.
Reading about state legislatures is always wild. They always use moon logic when debating and rarely mention the actual content of the bill. Driver deaths are spiking due to greater instances of inebriation on the road therefore to fix it the State of California needs to be able to track all drivers via GPS. Makes sense to me, why not.
- (a) As used in this article, “passive intelligent speed assistance system” means an integrated vehicle system that uses, at minimum, the GPS location of the vehicle compared with a database of posted speed limits, to determine the speed limit, and utilizes a brief, one-time visual and audio signal to alert the driver each time they exceed the speed limit by more than 10 miles per hour.
My favorite part of that is “what database?” If it’s local, who is responsible for updating it and how often. If it’s remote, who is responsible for updating it, how often and who pays for the connectivity costs and equipment?
Also since it’s GPS based, does this mean all new cars in CA will come with free Nav systems? (I know, I know)
load more comments
(2 replies)
And this would do what?
For the minority of drivers, get them to slow down. For the majority who speed, same as the seat belt alarm that annoys them but fails to get them to buckle up.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Many cars used to do this. There is a reason they don’t build this feature any longer.
Mandatory distractions. What could go wrong?
Fuck this shit! Fuck it in its fucking face! God I hate modern bullshit! Yes, most people can barely drive the speed limit, but some of us don't live with our heads perpetually up our own assholes, and there are legitimate reasons to exceed the speed limit. For one, if you try going the speed limit on the i5 in California, you'll turn into a greasy smear on the inside of your car cabin, since everyone else is going 20 over.
That site redirects you if you don't click a button...
view more: next ›