All AI generated content should be disclosed.
this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
137 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
3826 readers
609 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Agree. Came here to say the same. And it's not even far from what we've been doing in the past. When taking text or pictures from other people, we were/are also forced to mention that because of copyright. We could just do the same for AI generated content.
Or prohibited. Why would this ever be considered in political ads, seriously?
Why wouldn't it? I some politician or producer wants to use AI let them. They just should disclose it.
Because deep fakes aren't the only thing you can do with AI. There are lots of non-manipulative use cases for AI generation and those should now be excluded. I do believe any AI generation that includes images of people should be excluded.
They should require it to be disclosed for any ads.
Disclosed? It shouldn't be allowed at all.
How about just banning it?
That might be over the top. I think just making them state it would be good enough
I don't think it's over the top to ban ai content from political ads at all.
So they can make an ad showing their opponent do whatever fucked up thing they like with a fine print disclosure at the end, probably saying 'ai generated prediction of the future if you vote for this guy'. The thing about ads is that they work. Truth in advertising is essential. The post truth society is really worrying me.
They can do that now without AI
Making the procrss cheap, fast and simple might make it much more common.