this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
144 points (95.0% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Get those construction contacts signed!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

And Hinkley Point was such a roaring success, let's pour more money down the bottomless barrel!

[–] Ooops@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's an obvious distraction pushing the topic of nuclear power again, just days after they prepared to open massive new oil and gas production sites while stifling the well-going UK wind industry.

But there are enough people out there brain-washed by decades of anti-renewable propaganda that it will work. And in the end we have just another country failing to build the proper amount of nuclear base load AND the proper amount of renewables... but at least someone smart "thought ahead" and worked for enough fossil fuels to compensate.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

The conservatives just operate on the assumption that everybody else doesn't have a clue what's going on because they don't.

I bet they were told that the nuclear commission were going to open another power plant and just ignored them and gave out the oil drilling contracts anyway.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Burning coal is cheap, that's why we're here. I'll pay more for electric today to leave a planet for our children. Wish my parents did that for me.

Only a fool would consider the cost in dollars alone.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Only a fool would advocate for paying way more for nuclear when renewables + storage are substantially cheaper.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Ooops@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Nope, burning coal was cheap a long time ago and allowed the people to accululate enough wealth to push for more coal (and brain-wash people to believe coal is cheap; and also how expensive renewables are). Just like the nuclear producers did decades ago to tell the tale of how there's no alternative to nuclear.

The actual reality looks like this. And if you think that you need to pay more for electricity to not destroy the planet that's already their propaganda having done their work.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

Actually coal energy is expensive. Renewable energy is cheap energy.

[–] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

Also it works so flawlessly for the French (not*), why not do it too?

*France is slowly overcoming stress-corrosion problems (35 out of 56 reactors were down, drought is another problem), and Finland celebrates the commissioning of a new reactor (albeit 14 years late), while on the other hand monthly German nuclear generation will be zero for the first time in over 50 years.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Ya know, wind and solar are independent too, and much cheaper.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›