this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
178 points (95.4% liked)

News

35749 readers
2278 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Reuters) -Hopes are fading that Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and his foreign minister have survived a helicopter crash in mountainous terrain and icy weather, an Iranian official said on Monday after search teams located the wreckage. "President Raisi's helicopter was completely burned in the crash ... unfortunately, all passengers are feared dead," the official told Reuters.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This will be hugely destabilizing. Terrible.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Possibly, but it's the president not the supreme leader. The President is the "Head of Government", but the Supreme Leader is Head of State so who knows how much this will actually shake things up

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Probably not at all. I'm no expert on Iran, but I'm pretty sure I've never heard about the president of Iran on the news at all. Ayatollah Khamenei, on the other hand, plenty of times.

[–] Omgarm@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What? The president is definitely mentioned in the news. The Ayatollah is more important but he doesn't do everything alone. Also this president was a candidate to be the next Ayatollah.

[–] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I agree, while the head of state is the more important and powerful position, the president certainly isn't exactly powerless and handles the day to day business of government. But calling the leader the Ayatollah is slightly misleading. While it's a requirement in the constitution that the head of state be an Ayatollah, Ayatollah itself is a religious rank, not a political one. So there are many Ayatollahs around, even more since the revolution as many believe that the rank has become somewhat inflated.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

From other stuff I've read tonight, the pres and the SL were both pretty much sharing the sane agenda, so I really doubt this will shake stuff up, much.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate on why this would be destabilizing? I mean obviously the president dying is bad, but are there specific groups that are in positions to do anything to cause problems due to this? Wouldn't there be someone under him in the chain of command or another election that could be held?

I do not know very much about Iran's internal politics beyond a basic synopsis, I'm just looking for some info.

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Depends on the circumstances of why the helicopter crashed. If it was an accident, some maintenance issue, pilot error or medical emergency or something, then it won't be too bad.

If there's some evidence of sabotage or a deliberate attack then hold onto your hat because prime suspect #1 is going to be the Mossad.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

This is how I see it too. It’s probably not gonna be a huge deal in the long run, unless there is evidence of sabotage. I suppose it’s also possible that they could pretend to have evidence if they’re looking for a casus belli, but based on recent events I don’t think they’re looking to escalate if they don’t feel they have to.

[–] Dempf@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Spoiler for Homeland TV show

! Reminds me of the last season of Homeland

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Supporting mass murderers in the name of "stability" is just supporting mass murderers.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I never said I support him.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

All the people who will suffer and probably die as a result of the instability. Do you think that the world gets better when evil men die?

[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Likely.

Germany ended just fine after Hitler demise.

But you probably mean very near future.

[–] wetnoodle@sopuli.xyz -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They actually spent quite a few years (50, give or take a few) snapping back so hard the other direction the government was taking children from non-native Germans and giving them to pedophiles to rape for their whole childhood. So yes Hitler dying was good but instability will most always lead to more suffering.

Edit: Source

[–] aniki@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago

Terrible? What the fuck is wrong with you?

[–] comador@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

May Raisi burn in hell with "Virgins" that all resemble the thousands he sent to death.

[–] antifa 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think "feared" is overstating it a bit

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

5 pieces! He's still good!.… No Bobby, I fear he's dead....

[–] toasteecup@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's one hell of a "rough landing"

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

Publically hoping for the best but quietly preparing for the worst.

No, he was feared when he was alive. Most people actually celebrate his death...

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If it comes out that Israel did this it's going to be a Gavrillo Princep moment

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

If they think themselves to be prepared for it they can report Israel did this even if it was truly a maintenance issue

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 years ago

Be interesting to put the pieces together. Israel is sharp, they’d never do it without implicating the US.

[–] WamGams@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Didn't you know that Israel is responsible for every helicopter that crashed because a pilot decided to fly in unsafe conditions?

[–] juicy@lemmy.today 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's not like Israel just assassinated some Iranian generals a few weeks ago, or that they routinely operate on the ground in Iran:

Unlikely as it may sound, it’s not the first time Mossad has claimed to have undertaken such an operation. In fact, this is the third such case in the last eighteen months. In April 2022, Israeli media reported on an alleged Mossad operation on Iranian territory. Israeli intelligence agents had reportedly detained and questioned Mansour Rasouly, a fifty-two-year-old IRGC agent, in his residence in Iran, where he had confessed to a plan to assassinate an Israeli diplomat in Turkey, an American general stationed in Germany, and a journalist in France. The Israeli media published an audio file of Rasouly’s confession without revealing their source.

Months later, in July 2022, London-based diaspora satellite channel Iran International claimed that Mossad had interrogated another IRGC official, Yadollah Khedmati, in Iran, publishing the footage of his confessions about the transfer of weaponry to Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen.

[–] WamGams@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Let's wait until we have evidence before we jump to conclusions. Just because a thought aligns with our biases doesn't make it true.

[–] juicy@lemmy.today 1 points 2 years ago

Oh, sure. I'm just saying that it's reasonable to raise it as a possibility.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Nah, actually he's fucking dead. No fearing, we know now he's did dead.