this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
20 points (81.2% liked)

Cool GitHub Projects

1514 readers
1 users here now

Wormhole

!code_review@programming.dev

Icon base by Caro Asercion under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't see how it solves the mentioned issues. Instead, federation introduces new issues of complexity, multi-layered moderation, and potential for distributed inefficiency, confusion, or more malicious attacks.

I think we can see on Lemmy some of the problems it introduces. But for an Encyclopedia, which is supposed to be a source of truth, I think it's much worse.

If you depend on instance admins as curators, it's not that different from Wikipedia roles, which at least has open governance and elections.

They say other projects didn't reach critical mass. I don't think spreading your contributors thin - even while connecting them to some dynamic degree - is how you reach critical mass.

[–] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would describe this as an uncool GitHub project. Federation isn't the answer to every problem.

[–] pop@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

What do you think crowdsourcing is?

Federating knowledge sourcing/entry/moderation (without a central authority) to the users is what made Wikipedia what it is today.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine if wikipedia editor wars could be ended with defederation.