this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
139 points (99.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 74 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've seen a guy not lose half of his hand thanks to a sawstop. The tech is good. Most of SawStop's patents have also expired, and SawStop has agreed to make the key aspects that are technically still patented open to the public by the effective date of the law.

This shit is a no-brainer and even a 5 second Google search blows up her whole narrative on this instantly. Loser shit.

[–] Elon_Musk@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sawstop is a lawsuit happy patent troll that is pushing this regulation so that every saw maker operating in the US has to pay them a licensing fee.

[–] BearerOfPickles@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

I read they are also offering their patent to other table saw producers if this passes.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Finger safety devices are fucking awesome. The one I was working with a few years ago, if the blade encounters something conductive like your finger, an electro-magnet throws a block of aluminum in to the saw blade and stops it. Near instantly. Finger saved. It costs, idk, 100$ to reset, but that's a damn sight less than losing a finger. Like you might be nicked but you're probably not even going to need a bandaid. Just so damn cool, and one of the biggest dangers in a wood shop becomes vastly, vastly safer to work with.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't know; I've always felt this kind of tech, while it has its upsides, tends to come with some severe downsides.

How are you ever going to justify the use of a table saw in a horror movie ever again?

[–] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Kids these days just don't get that Emo Philips scene in UHF (1989) because of SawStop™️ working in cahoots with BIG WOKE!

[–] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If this isn't already a bit in a Scream-like horror comedy it should be. Or maybe the killer comes at someone with a chainsaw, but they're wearing one of those pairs of anti-chainsaw pants.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

I feel like Wish Upon has a scene where Audrey from Twin Peaks has a bunch of fake-out accidental deaths in a kitchen until she finally gets got.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Just have a character mention in the first act they can't do a project because they're having issues with the table saw.

It's how the strangers justified killing somebody by putting their head in an open microwave and turning it on, which would require multiple safety devices to fail.

[–] What_Religion_R_They@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How are you ever going to justify the use of a table saw in a horror movie ever again?

the saw is owned by a guy who really hates the government patent trolls

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Libertarians were the real monsters all along

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

The victim seems totally calm until.they notice it's a tablesaw from prior to the regulatory date. Cause you fucking know you won't have to update your saws as an employer let alone a private owner. Which will probably also be a thing that if it becomes necessary then it will only apply to new saws and anyone thst already had an industrial saw, which is generally built to last or be serviced like a ship.of theseus where as far as regulations are concerned it's the same saw they bought in the 70s, you won't see it unless some saws get sabbed

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

well if patents are a problems then lets abolish all patents

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Yea I was going to say I'm positive she doesn't actually care about it and it's just her excuse to oppose it but it is bullshit to require something that's protected intellectual property. That's just government establishing a monopoly.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

I'm for small government but it means not recognizing or defending intellectual property or LLCs.

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

raise costs by hundreds of dollars

maybe I'm misunderstanding but this person is introducing legislation to save producers money on the scale of hundreds of dollars?

[–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sawstops cost like 900 dollars a unit whereas an unsafe Milwaukee or DeWalt costs like 500. If you trigger the stop on a sawstop it runs you need to spend 100 dollars and two minutes on a new brake, which is less than hospital bills by a long margin. I don't think this bill saves anyone money whatsoever.

[–] WayeeCool@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Nvm, it turns out SawStop has agreed to open their patent up to the rest of the industry royalty free should such a law ever be passed.

https://www.sawstop.com/news/sawstop-to-dedicate-key-u-s-patent-to-the-public-upon-the-effective-date-of-a-rule-requiring-safety-technology-on-all-table-saws/

~~The real issue with the law is SawStop holds an exclusive patent on the concept of power tools detecting fingers and automatically stopping. They have enforced their IP right ruthlessly and as such hold a monopoly that allows them to charge a $900 premium.~~

~~So I guess the problem is the US government mandating the technology without first seizing the patent and opening it up to competitors. It would be like the US government mandating airbags or seatbelts without the patent holders opening the IP up to the entire industry. Iirc Volvo holds most of the patents for a lot of automotive safety technologies but has always allowed the rest of the industry to use the tech royalty free in order to promote industry wide adoption.~~

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

You're right, and this Rep. is wrong and bad for not even making the suggestion that the government could do that.

[–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the patent needs to be opened.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

More than this, the tech will become an open standard on the effective date of the mandate, meaning anyone can manufacture them for free. The current cost vector is just licensing, your new saw will be safe and still like $500.

[–] Rojo27@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, correction. HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS!made-it-the-fuck-up

[–] Rojo27@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Consumer choice"

Fuuuuuck offkombucha-disgust

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Hey now, as a consumer I have the right to choose that the people who made my product have their fingers sliced off; I'll never meet them, I'll never personally see it happen, but it's important to me to know it happened.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

The customers likes finger meat in their food. Workers like losing fingers to table saws. It's a win-win for all.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

consumer

FUCK ALL THE WAY OFF

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

i fucking second this

i cannot stand that fucking word any longer

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

Actually this is kinda based.....

Consumers choice should be protected; personally I won't buy any wooden stuff unless I know the work to make it severed fingers.

I also support protection for child labor rights; I won't be happy unless I know my wooden stuff was anointed with the blood of the innocent.

[–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

I mean it would be great if sawstop didn't have a monopoly but most people I know refuse to work on anything that isn't a sawstop.

[–] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

the word "consumer" is doing world record breaking amounts of lifting here

Death to America

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

The Texas Tablesaw Massacre

[–] adultswim_antifa@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Another Berniecrat embarrassment bern-disgust

[–] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

she should have all her fingers cut off one by one

[–] fraksken 16 points 1 year ago

If you do it all at the same time, you're not operating the saw correctly

[–] MaxOS@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] AutomatedPossum@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

MGP actually stands for Marie Glued Pinky, due to a consumer choice related saw accident.

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

She's showing an awful lot of fingers in that picture to start mandating anything. Goddamn elitist fingertrapper. Prove it lady!

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

sawstop company rn: - hey, boeing, could you recommend a couple of operators? yeah, just one job for now

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

until the patents for this tech are made public

That'd be OK with me if you forced the patents to be public sooner. I'd say just eminent domain the patent and pay the owners a fuckton for making digitsaving tech real but thats probably illegal in two dozen different ways.

[–] sir_this_is_a_wendys@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would need to know more. I don't think safety measures should be monopolized. What is the downside to making the patents public?

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Didn't Volvo release the patent for the modern 3 point seatbelt specifically so everyone could start installing them? I mean, ideally that shouldn't even be a call a company should be able to make, but it is an example of some people not being complete ratfuckers when public safety is a concern.

[–] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure there's no legal means to do that, so what she's asking for isn't a serious demand.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Consumer choice? Fucking bushit, most people using this stuff are at work when they're doing so. I work kitchens and I'm.thinking about the same application for meat slicers cause I've seen some horrors there and of course any running saw would benefit immensely and it wouldn't even be remotely difficult to implement, you stick a thermometer gun to the thing and if an alive temperature enters that zone it shuts down. It could even serve a dual purpose of seeing the temp of what you're cutting which can be useful for quite a few things that are best cut from frozen but the blade can warm up fast. I could literally build this for like $40 and that's to safely mod industrial equipment, building it in wouldn't cost much at all on what's already a very expensive piece of hardware. A hand detector would realistically make it like $20 more max.

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd have to look into.the finer points of how the thermo gun is hooked up but you could place it somewhere out of the way of what you're cutting but still near the blade and add a shield to keep the radius of where the thermometer is detecting near the blade, have a general range for human hand temp which will pretty much always be higher thsn anything else in range by a good amount, wire that to a kill switch that you wire to the power supply. Temp guns being a whole digital thing is probably beyond my immediate knowledge, don't know my way around a circuit board too good, but I do know a guy who builds my amps and pedals who for sure does.

load more comments (3 replies)

Can't even cut workers' fingers off anymore. Because of woke.

[–] nasezero@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought she looked familiar, you know it's bad when she lost r/politics. Not that I think they took any valuable lessons from this.

MGP is not a bait and switch candidate, she was a compromise candidate within that district to defeat a fascist.

maybe-later-honey

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

load more comments
view more: next ›