this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
162 points (96.0% liked)

News

31652 readers
2635 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The economy as a whole has proved resilient amid the highest rates in decades. But beneath the surface, many low- and moderate-income families are struggling.

High interest rates haven’t crashed the financial system, set off a wave of bankruptcies or caused the recession that many economists feared.

But for millions of low- and moderate-income families, high rates are taking a toll.

The overall economy has proved unexpectedly resilient to high interest rates. Consumers have continued spending on travel, restaurant meals and entertainment thanks to rising wages and debt levels that, despite their recent increase, remain manageable as a share of income for most people.

But aggregate figures obscure an underlying divide that is likely to widen the longer interest rates remain high. Affluent households, and even many in the middle class, have largely been insulated from the effects of the Fed’s policies. Many took out long-term mortgages when rates were at rock bottom in 2020 or earlier — if they don’t own their homes outright — and most have little if any variable-rate debt. And they are benefiting from higher returns on their savings.

For poorer families, it is different. They are likelier to carry a balance on credit cards, meaning they’re more likely to feel high rates. According to Fed data, about 56 percent of people earning less than $25,000 carried a credit card balance in 2022, compared with 38 percent of those earning more than $100,000. Black Americans, like Ms. Dorsey, and Latinos are also more likely to carry balances.

Non-paywall link

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 year ago

Everything economically always hits poor Americans the hardest... this isn't meant to undercut the article - it's important to realize why. But, bear in mind that when interest rates are low poor Americans don't have access to the same low interest loans that upper class assholes use to price them out of purchases.

TL;DR whatever the economic situation, poor people get fucked - when it's lean times they have to tighten their belt the most... and when it's times of plenty they get the smallest piece of the pie - they're always being squeezed and if you understand the different mechanisms squeezing them you'll really want to sharpen a fucking pitchfork.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine how divorced from reality you must be to not understand that money issues impact poor people the most. NYT readership in a nutshell.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 1 year ago

Every problem affects poorer people worse. Because you can use money to buy your way out of problems.

[–] henfredemars 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

When the cost of capital is virtually zero, do you know who gets hurt the hardest? Once again, the poor! It doesn’t matter whether interest rates are super high or super low. It still sucks to be poor.

What a dumb title. The poor can’t take advantage of low interest rates. They see their homes and shopping centers bought up. Their lives ever more precarious. The title makes it sound like we should lower interest rates. No! That would mainly serve to benefit the wealthy. You need to take specific actions to help these people which are usually to the detriment of the super consolidated business.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

S&P is up? Poor people suffer. Is down? Also suffering. Up, down, get it? ... We have the best financial system in the world, because of suffering.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They also never seriously look at increasing taxes on those with higher incomes, which would lower inflation more effectively, since they have more room for discretionary spending.

Or reform the tax system altogether to target wealth instead of income.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Tired of these articles poo pooing how bad the poor have it in their Ivory Towers insulated from the worries of the world.

But seriously, no shit! That's basically the definition of poor! This is why we need social safety nets and UBI. So they can be in less danger. Which anyone would want unless they are evil. You cannot want to put people in danger because they don't make a high enough wage, and not be evil.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While this is entirely true and is deplorable, did anyone else notice the thumbnail guy looks a hell of a lot like Mitch Hedburg?

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

First thing I noticed as well.