this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
149 points (98.7% liked)

technology

23218 readers
2 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 76 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think the saddest thing about modern American engineering and tech is that they would all be fucking psyched about Chinese tech and cars if they were born in China. Like, the only reason these people are so blinkered about China is because they were born in the U.S.

They are so sure that they can see past the propaganda, that they are just eating shit the whole way down.

[–] AcidLeaves@hexbear.net 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

pretty sure the saddest thing about modern American engineering and tech is that most of it is used for either military weapons of mass death or software tools of unimaginable surveillance and data collection

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

Nah, that's just scary and pretty par for the course, not sad.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Military weapons of mass death that either don't even work, they can't field, or are ineffective!

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

They're perfectly adequate at their job: Funneling money to Raytheon stockholders, and blowing up afghani villages.

[–] AcidLeaves@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

can we stop this? you're doing the thing fascists do where the enemy is weak and strong

did we forget how many people have been killed by American weapons?

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was thinking about stuff like those helicopters that crash constantly, the way so much of the US military is in disrepair, from that thread recently. It was just meant as a jab about how the US military is an inefficient machine that exists for profit, not winning wars. I guess that's not "mass death" though, more like bombers and drones. Sorry.

I dunno if it's DOIN A FASCISM to acknowledge given that the US is a country that's party to genocide and so much more whose genocidaires are senile old men and big wet reality TV personalities, but y'know...

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

The weapons of the Amerikkkan military are extremely good at killing people and at generating shareholder value. They are not very good at achieving strategic objectives like opening straits or winning wars.

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

phoenix-objection-1phoenix-objection-2 objection

All of the "amazing" Chinese cars pictured in the article are full of touchscreen infotainment systems. China is cooked as well.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I am here to tell you that america communists are wildly out of touch with the consumption tastes of the average Chinese public.

Not that we aren't right to be cynical about our own engineers achieving the same results as Chinese manufacturing.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Touchscreens are ludicrously dangerous interfaces for cars that have basically only proliferated because of techbro dipshits mucking about with things they don't understand. Cars need fixed controls that provide physical feedback and which don't require reading or light to operate. Like that's not a matter of taste, that's a basic "this is usable and safe" thing.

[–] macerated_baby_presidents@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that have basically only proliferated because of techbro dipshits mucking about with things they don't understand

I hate touchscreens too, but the reason they're so prevalent is they're cheaper than engineering and manufacturing a bunch of custom physical buttons and knobs

[–] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't accept the capitalist premise that it's normal to compromise safety for expediency and cheapness.

Also, you can reuse some of that engineering through a full line of cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You are being idealistic and giving into American exceptionalism.

However much you or I hate it, it is a matter of taste. Interfaces can be made to work intuitively, touch screen phones prove you do not need to have fixed analog buttons, and screen brightness is easy to program to adjust automatically. Our shit doesn't work because tech bros are addicted to a million unneeded features and menus. If you are just looking for a style you can vastly simplify your interface and limit your options to what is strictly nessecery. Most Chinese people will not be driving these kinds of teched-out cars.

I think it's ugly as sin, and I hope it is a passing trend, but that doesn't mean this stuff is impossible to do well. It just means we can't do it well.

[–] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Touch screens aren't better or safe just because China is doing it. It may appeal to the Chinese market. Doesn't matter; still bad.

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

It's not a matter of taste. Physical feedback is qualitatively different than one that is purely visual. Driving is a visual intensive act, and even a brief look away can be dangerous, but a touch screen interface relies on visual feedback to navigate because you cannot feel the buttons. These senses work differently on a fundamental level

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

touch screen phones prove you do not need to have fixed analog buttons

Touchscreen phones and tablets are all horrible and notorious for not working right whether that's in the form of presses not registering or registering in the wrong spot. Like think of all the design that goes into a decent keyboard, the way keys are differentiable without pressing them, how there are physical marks that tell you where your hand is touching it, and how all this combines into an input device that you don't have to look at to use quickly and accurately (hell, my keyboard no longer has letter markers on half the keys because they've worn off over the nearly 20 years I've been using it, and this doesn't matter because keystrokes are even more ingrained into my hands than literal written text is, but this relies on the tactile feedback of them).

Meanwhile a touchscreen is a flat, featureless surface where nothing has a fixed position, any input may or may not work, and you have to watch it to see where it wants to put a button and whether that button is reacting correctly or prompting another input. Operating traditional controls that require a hand to be removed from the wheel, like for a car radio or the AC, is already considered a dangerous hazard that's only tolerated because it has to be; making that at least an order of magnitude more distracting is a catastrophically bad idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

I hate them so much, but every American I know likes them so it doesn't surprise me that Chinese people do too.

I want analogue switches! meow-tableflip

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I prefer physical controls too, but you have to understand that touchscreen car interfaces aren't meant to be used while driving- ie, you're supposed to set climate presets and use voice controls to replace the constant fiddling with buttons and dials. I hate speaking to gadgets and sure as hell don't want to talk to my car, but this is where everything is heading.

[–] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

Naw dog, there's nothing saying you can't use both physical dials and voice controls. False dichotomy. There should be physical controls that you don't have to look at + voice commands, not touch screen that you have to look at + voice commands.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Nobody Cares About Western Brands in China

All of the press conferences for the model debuts were in Chinese, and I didn’t always have a translator or interpreter at hand. When I could, I wandered around, looking to see what else I could learn while in China. 

The first stand I stumbled upon was Buick’s. It unveiled two GM Ultium-based concepts, the Electra L and Electra LT. It had also unveiled a PHEV version of its popular GL8 van. But where the hell was everyone? It was barely 10 a.m., on the first day of the Beijing Auto show; two concepts were just revealed sometime earlier that morning, yet there were only a handful of spectators at the Buick stand. There was no information on either concept. No one seemed to care. 

He goes on to describe the same scenario at basically all the other western brands.

Can you imagine if the Soviet Union had operated this way? Just let the western brands in and then utterly demolish them with soviet industry prices and quality. You get the benefits of competition pushing your industry to do better while demolishing any argument that your people want or would prefer western luxuries to what's available.

Closing to the capitalists was always a mistake when you could just let your own industries demolish and embarrass them.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Parenti discussed in Blackshirts and Reds how people in the Eastern bloc were seduced by Western consumer goods. The real and perceived superiority of Western treats is a form of soft power. China will not make the same mistake as them.

[–] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Soviet Union censorship was at a time without social media and university students finding out all the details in person. The underground radio stations and western music being played really leveled up the mystique of western goods, and the only people traveling to the west were more likely to be PMC or boojie in attitudes.

Now you have kids living in working apartments from Shenzhen and Lanzhou going to schools like University of Oklahoma going, “this is it?!?”, and sharing their complaints on WeChat

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

The USSR walked so China could run 🏃‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 58 points 1 year ago (8 children)

i'm extremely pissed that melon-musk convinced everyone that the aesthetic of the future was putting a big ass screen for all the car controls. dogshit. asking everybody to drive into each other and die. chinese automakers could be innovating extremely retrofuture tactile controls that do all this cool shit, but no, we just have this nonsense.

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That shit should be outlawed and the marketing people who forced the engineers ti make this should be sent to siberia

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

yikes-1yikes-2yikes-2yikes-3

Looooooooooooooooooong Taaaaaaaaaaaablet

[–] laziestflagellant@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The big "infotainment" screens in cars genuinely give me the heebie jeebies, I can't stand looking at them. It doesn't help that reading text in a moving car as a passenger makes me motion sick.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the one big screen is a surrogate for the 3+ smartphones each and every Chinese DiDi driver I've ever seen seemingly has.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pili@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the Xiaomi SU7 still has physical buttons in addition to the screen. That's what they show in their promo videos anyway. That car looks so good.

Edit: yup, it has a bunch of physical switches and even a volume knob, Xiaomi keeps winning.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chickentendrils@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Forget electric cars show me the train-shining

[–] ShareThatBread@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cope in the articles comments section

Riot police brutally bashing unarmed college students in the background Aha! The cracks in communism are finally starting to show.

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

and the cars it wants to foist on the public are cut-rate spyware machines designed to murder American citizens whenever the Chinese Communist Party flips the kill switch.

sicko-wistful

[–] HorseRabbit@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Voidance@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably didn’t waste enormous time and resources on ‘self-driving’ AI

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Those cars are undoubtedly impressive, but I hate the interiors. Screens should be integrated into the center console and nowhere near the gauge cluster.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I tend to agree; I think BYD's latest Seagull strikes the balance well, though it could do with more buttons and dials

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MovingThrowaway@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

God if I learn Mandarin will xi let me move to china

[–] TheModerateTankie@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, you think these are affordable? Have you forgotten the $10,000 "China Bad" fee? eco-porky

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›