this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
117 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

3964 readers
219 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Quadrupeds being reviewed have automatic targeting systems but require human oversight to fire.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

we are living in the future! the terrifying, horrific future!

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fucking hell. I had really hoped that the world could have gotten off its collective ass to ratify some international agreement limiting the use of AI for shit like this before we'd start seeing these headlines.

[–] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, even before this, AI has been in actual implementation by Israel to kill Palestinians, so there's no way any Western country would have agreed to ban it.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

No amount of treaties is ever going to prevent the weaponisation of AI. Nobody can afford to not do it.

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] nick@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago

Hey, fuck this noise.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Turkey has the STM Kargu, which reportedly was devastating in the most recent # Nagorno-Karabakh fighting, as the autonomous suicide drone can’t be jammed

Ukrainian units have (reportedly) already loaded ‘final approach’ AI target tracking and flight controls on their suicide FPV & glider drones, to counter Russian RF jammers mounted on tanks and heavy vehicles

We really, really aren’t prepared for the threat vector that cheap (sub $500/ea for FPV) and autonomous drones provide, and every RF engineer and drone enthusiast I’ve spoken to has no good counter aside from barriers like nets. And that’s just the ones that fly their bombs INTO things, drone-dropped explosives are hard to detect without thermal imagers or specialized radar/acoustic detection

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Soon we'll have autonomous drone hunter drones. And then drone hunter hunters. And drone hunter hunter hunters. And so on. The future will be wild.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So we made Metalhead from Black Mirror? Cool....cool cool cool...so uhh... how do I wake up from this nightmare again?

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can somebody whip together an emp grenade to counteract these bastards?

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago

A lot of this stuff is shielded. Their biggest weakness is command takeover, where some form of injection attack can give you the unit, especially when they’re AI-based. I’m sure there’s plenty of research on this and the money won’t be considered necessary to plug the holes making impossible.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I guess poison injecting spiders, and bullets that chase you are next. I want to go back to when this was just sci-fi.

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Do they also shoot tracker tacks?

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Please, give them a mouth with toxin injecting teeth, and I'll get my flamethrower and play Guy Montag.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Would anti drone guns work on these?

[–] Des@hexbear.net -2 points 1 year ago

can't wait to find out from some investigation that the robots have been choosing to fire on their own for like 1.5 of the 2 years they were deployed in combat