this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
307 points (95.5% liked)

politics

25236 readers
3526 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 112 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump's scandals are like Mr. Burns' infectious diseases. There's just so goddamn many that nobody can focus on one.

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

The media can only dish on him on 1-2 topics at once, else they'd be biased 🙄

[–] Tujio@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anybody question why his social media company has a revenue stream roughly equal to that of a single McDonald's franchise, yet is valued at 9 billion dollars?

[–] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Are you suggesting Trump may be linked to assets that are artificially inflated? I don't believe it!

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cause the entire stock market is based on feels.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

And bots, and the feels of bots.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Because I don’t want to be dragged into Saudi embassies and knifed to death.

Well, I don’t really know anything, but that’s what happens to reporters who do.

Also most big-name news services get paid to silence stories about the wrong people.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

one of trump’s primary strategies has always been to DDOS the bandwidth of the media and you, emotionally, with evil, to the point that entire segments get dropped.

i am frustrated with it too. we had him shut up for like a week and half with the twitter ban but now media is back on the profit-off-the-orange-man train again and so the bulk of the most significant news is effectively swept under the rug.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

This guy is the physical embodiment of a firehose of propaganda. Like Dugin kidnapped and programmed Trump himself.

[–] whatupwiththat@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

The media would rather talk Bidens age...

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If Joe Biden had done that, the clip would be played so often the music would have a club remix.

[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 5 points 1 year ago

Oh yes, don't forget Jared Kushner's 'special relationship' with the crown prince of saudia arabia that netted him a $2billion investment. Jared spent his time as an official making business deals around the globe while daddy-in-law was in office.

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Because the Saudis don't want us to.

[–] freebread@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Bush got away with it, why wouldn't they let Trump off the hook too?

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Because the 24-hour news cycle doesn't have the attention span for anything not immediately headline grabbing in the current moment.

AKA it's not making any immediate noise and there are more exciting things to constantly bombard us all with.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Republican-led House Oversight Committee has spent most of the past five months hard at work trying to link “the Biden family” (read: relatives of President Biden but not Biden himself) to millions of dollars proffered by foreign business interests before Biden became president.

With the 2024 presidential campaign already at the top of the political conversation, the idea that some revelation might prove to be politically damaging to the incumbent is obviously a central motivation.


The original article contains 76 words, the summary contains 76 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

Because Trump appointed Judge Cannon cancelled his May trial date over the classified documents case which implicates the Saudis in Trump's criminal activities.

We had a date set to talk about it and assign punishment, and a federal judge cancelled it.