"generalist predators switch over to feeding on this bounty of food".
I mean, and then they switch back after the cicadas are gone, because they're generalists, no?
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
"generalist predators switch over to feeding on this bounty of food".
I mean, and then they switch back after the cicadas are gone, because they're generalists, no?
I haven't read the paper, but I don't think it's that simple. Having an endless supply of food increases fecundity among predator populations, which means next year there may be a lot more of the animals that eat cicadas than there are this year, but the cicadas will be gone. The question is whether there will be enough food to sustain the increased population size next year, and the answer is probably going to be no.
But isn't this normal? Predator and prey are rarely in balance.
Population growth cycles are usually pretty stable under typical conditions. It's hard to overstate the number of cicadas emerging with these two broods aligning this year, this will be a population growth cycle on steroids for predators, which is why it's remarkable. Next year, with so many additional predators, they will negatively affect the populations of other prey due to increased predation, which will negatively affect predator populations the following year, etc. The point is the population disruptions in these ecological systems will be large
One of the theories as to why these periodical cicadas evolved these lengthy reproductive cycles is because they avoid elevating predator populations long-term.
Mongol invasion happened to coincide with a period of mild winters in Mongolia. That weird moment when you and all your neighbors have fifty horses and you're left wondering what now?